Development of a second-generation environmentally superior technology for treatment of swine manure in the USA.

New swine waste management systems in North Carolina need to meet high performance standards of an environmentally superior technology (EST) regarding nitrogen, phosphorus, heavy metals, pathogens, ammonia and odor emissions, and remain affordable and simple to operate. The objective of this study was to develop a second-generation treatment system that can achieve high EST standards at reduced costs. The system used solids separation, nitrification/denitrification and phosphorus removal/disinfection, and was demonstrated at full-scale on a 5145-head swine farm during three production cycles (15-months). Removal efficiencies were: 98% suspended solids, 97% ammonia, 95% phosphorus, 99% copper and zinc, 99.9% odors, and 99.99% pathogens. The system met EST standards at 1/3 the cost of the previous version. Animal health and productivity were enhanced; hog sales increased 32,900 kg/cycle (5.6%). These results demonstrated that: (1) significant cost reductions were achieved by on-farm implementation and continued engineering improvements, and (2) the new waste management system substantially benefited livestock productivity.

[1]  E. Alocilja,et al.  PATHOGENS IN ANIMAL WASTES AND THE IMPACTS OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON THEIR SURVIVAL, TRANSPORT AND FATE , 2006 .

[2]  John P. Chastain,et al.  Swine Manure Production and Nutrient Content , 1998 .

[3]  S. Schiffman,et al.  Quantification of odors and odorants from swine operations in North Carolina , 2001 .

[4]  M. Vanotti,et al.  Enhanced Animal Productivity and Health with Improved Manure Management in 2nd Generation Environmentally Superior Technology in North Carolina: II. Air Quality , 2008 .

[5]  James C. Barker.  Effects of Manure Management Practices on Air Quality and Animal Performance in Swine Production Buildings , 2008 .

[6]  Viney P. Aneja,et al.  Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from swine waste storage and treatment lagoons , 2000 .

[7]  C M Williams.  Development of environmentally superior technologies in the US and policy. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Patrick G. Hunt,et al.  SOLID–LIQUID SEPARATION OF FLUSHED SWINE MANURE WITH PAM: EFFECT OF WASTEWATER STRENGTH , 2002 .

[9]  Matias B Vanotti,et al.  Water quality improvements of wastewater from confined animal feeding operations after advanced treatment. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[10]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  Abatement of Ammonia Emissions from Swine Lagoons Using Polymer-Enhanced Solid-Liquid Separation , 2007 .

[11]  M. Vanotti,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms. , 2008, Waste management.

[12]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Reduction of malodorous compounds from a treated swine anaerobic lagoon. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.

[13]  John H. Loughrin,et al.  Evaluation of second-generation multistage wastewater treatment system for the removal of malodors from liquid swine waste. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[14]  Patrick G. Hunt,et al.  Solids and nutrient removal from flushed swine manure using polyacrylamides , 1999 .

[15]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS SEPARATION OF PHOSPHORUS SLUDGE AND MANURE SOLIDS WITH POLYMERS , 2007 .

[16]  N. Bolan,et al.  Distribution and Bioavailability of Trace Elements in Livestock and Poultry Manure By-Products , 2004 .

[17]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  REDUCTION OF AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM TREATED ANAEROBIC SWINE LAGOONS , 2006 .

[18]  Ariel A. Szogi,et al.  Aerobic Composting of Swine Manure Solids Mixed with Cotton Gin Waste , 2006 .

[19]  Patrick G. Hunt,et al.  Extraction of Soluble Phosphorus from Swine Wastewater , 2002 .

[20]  Patrick G Hunt,et al.  Removal of pathogen and indicator microorganisms from liquid swine manure in multi-step biological and chemical treatment. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[21]  G. Houtven,et al.  Benefits of Adopting Environmentally Superior Swine Waste Management Technologies in North Carolina: An Environmental and Economic Assessment. Final Report , 2003 .

[22]  Michael A. Mallin,et al.  Impacts of Industrial Animal Production on Rivers and Estuaries , 2000 .

[23]  Beatrice Gralton,et al.  Washington DC - USA , 2008 .

[24]  R. F. Shore,et al.  The effect of pig farming on copper and zinc accumulation in cattle in Galicia (north-western Spain). , 2000, Veterinary journal.

[25]  Utilization of nutrients from animal manure: legislation and technology solutions , 2003 .

[26]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[27]  Patrick G Hunt,et al.  Development of environmentally superior treatment system to replace anaerobic swine lagoons in the USA. , 2007, Bioresource technology.