Structural Knowledge: How Executive Experience with Structural Composition Affects Intrafirm Mobility and Unit Reconfiguration

This article explores how knowledge embodied in executives is tied to the organizational context in which it develops. Drawing on the knowledge-based view of the firm and human capital theory, we predict that executives will move between units with similar ‘structural composition’ — a characteristic representing unit origin (as acquired or internally developed) and how the unit was reconfigured. We further argue that executives will be conduits of organizational change. We predict that units receiving more transferred executives, executives with recombination experience, and executives from core internal units will have a greater likelihood of being recombined, while units receiving executives from previously acquired units will tend to remain unchanged. The study examines a 20-year panel of 48 multidivisional firms from the U.S. medical sector.

[1]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: a Case Study of Synergy Realization , 1999 .

[2]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[3]  M. Hitt,et al.  Direct and Moderating Effects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2001 .

[4]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[5]  P. Rosenzweig.  Managing Acquisitions: Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal , 1991 .

[6]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Learning from Complexity: Effects of Prior Accidents and Incidents on Airlines' Learning , 2002 .

[7]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Internal corporate restructuring: An empirical analysis , 1990 .

[8]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992 , 1998 .

[9]  Samina Karim,et al.  Exploring structural embeddedness of product market activities and resources within business units , 2012 .

[10]  M. Porter.  From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy , 1989 .

[11]  April Franco,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL , 2004 .

[12]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[13]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[14]  Gregory A. Bigley,et al.  New CEOs and Corporate Strategic Refocusing: How Experience as Heir Apparent Influences the Use of Power , 2002 .

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[16]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[17]  J. Benjamin Forbes,et al.  Early Intraorganizational Mobility: Patterns and Influences , 1987 .

[18]  Deepak K. Datta.  Organizational fit and acquisition performance: Effects of post-acquisition integration , 1991 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[20]  Warren B. Brown,et al.  Successor Type and Organizational Change in the Corporate Enterprise. , 1972 .

[21]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[22]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Patterns of Mobility Within Industrial Organizations , 1956 .

[23]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[24]  G. Becker,et al.  The Economic Approach to Human Behavior , 1978 .

[25]  Amy L. Pablo.  Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. , 1994 .

[26]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Psst…The merger mavens still have it wrong! , 1996 .

[27]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: post‐acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers , 2004 .

[28]  Eric B. Dent,et al.  Challenging “Resistance to Change” , 1999 .

[29]  S. Karim.  Modularity in Organizational Structure: The Reconfiguration of Internally Developed and Acquired Business Units , 2006 .

[30]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Unpacking Prior Experience: How Career History Affects Job Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[31]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[32]  W. Boeker.  Executive Migration and Strategic Change: The Effect of Top Manager Movement on Product-Market Entry , 1997 .

[33]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[34]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[35]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Asset Divestiture Following Horizontal Acquisitions: A Dynamic View , 2001 .

[36]  W. Ocasio.  TOWARDS AN ATTENTION-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM , 1997 .

[37]  H. Wilensky.  Work, careers and social integration. , 1960 .

[38]  M. Sturman,et al.  Executive Career Management: Switching Organizations and the Boundaryless Career , 2007 .

[39]  H. Rao,et al.  HARNESSING MANAGERIAL KNOWLEDGE TO IMPLEMENT PRODUCT-LINE EXTENSIONS: HOW DO MUTUAL FUND FAMILIES ALLOCATE PORTFOLIO MANAGERS TO OLD AND NEW FUNDS? , 2002 .

[40]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[41]  S. Menard.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[42]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[43]  Hans C. Jessen,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression Analysis , 1996 .

[44]  Terrence C. Sebora,et al.  Executive Succession: Past, Present & Future , 1994 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[46]  Daniel B. Turban,et al.  Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. , 1994 .

[47]  Kenneth B. Schwartz,et al.  Executive Succession in Failing Firms , 1985 .

[48]  Gino Cattani,et al.  Preadaptation, Firm Heterogeneity, and Technological Performance: A Study on the Evolution of Fiber Optics, 1970–1995 , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[49]  H. Barkema,et al.  Toward Unlocking The Full Potential of Acquisitions: The Role of Organizational Restructuring , 2008 .

[50]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[51]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Inside/Outside Succession and Organizational Size: The Pragmatics of Executive Replacement , 1983 .

[52]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[53]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[54]  Srilata Zaheer,et al.  Knowledge Retention and Personnel Mobility: The Nondisruptive Effects of Inflows of Experience , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[55]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Evolutionary diffusion: internal and external methods used to acquire encompassing, complementary, and incremental technological changes in the lithotripsy industry , 1998 .

[56]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[57]  George T. Milkovich,et al.  A Model of Intra-Organizational Mobility , 1981 .

[58]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[59]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Learning by Doing Something Else: Variation, Relatedness, and the Learning Curve , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[61]  D. Rubinfeld,et al.  Econometric models and economic forecasts , 2002 .

[62]  Y. Vardi,et al.  Intraorganizational Mobility and Career Perceptions Among Rank and File Employees in Different Technologies , 1977 .

[63]  Paul R. Lawrence,et al.  How to Deal with Resistance to Change , 1970 .

[64]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  Relationships Between Type of Acquisition, The Autonomy Given to the Acquired Firm, and Acquisition Success: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[65]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Innovating Through Acquisition and Internal Development: A Quarter-Century of Boundary Evolution at Johnson & Johnson , 2004 .

[66]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[67]  Thomas A. DiPrete,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Mobility in Organizations. , 1987 .

[68]  Charles Williams,et al.  Focusing Firm Evolution: The Impact of Information Infrastructure on Market Entry by U.S. Telecommunications Companies, 1984 - 1998 , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[69]  Samina Karim,et al.  Business Unit Reorganization and Innovation in New Product Markets , 2009, Manag. Sci..