Assessing the Consistency of Complete and Incomplete Topological Information

This work was partially funded by grants from Intergraph Corporation. Jayant Sharma was supported by a University Graduate Research Assistantship (UGRA) from the University of Maine. Additional support from NSF for the NCGIA under grant number SES 88-10917 is gratefully acknowledged. High-level topological information about spatial objects can be described in terms of a set of binary topological relations between the objects, also called a scene description. The objects of interest are , which are bounded objects that have a distinct identity and are homeomorphic to a 2-disk. The consistent integration of topological information relies inherently on the algebraic properties of the relations between the objects. Properties such as the converseness of pairs of relations and the composition of relations must be fulfilled for any combination of relations in order to guarantee that a scene description is free of internal topological contradictions so that it can be realized in IR . A rigorous computational method has been designed to reason about binary topological relations between spatial regions and to infer the consistency of complete and incomplete topological information. As a side-product, the method can be also used to refine incomplete observations. The method applies immediately in spatial query processing in geographic information systems to detect unsolvable queries prior to query execution and in data fusion to integrate independently collected information.

[1]  Alfred Tarski,et al.  Relational selves as self-affirmational resources , 2008 .

[2]  Ugo Montanari,et al.  Networks of constraints: Fundamental properties and applications to picture processing , 1974, Inf. Sci..

[3]  John Freeman,et al.  The modelling of spatial relations , 1975 .

[4]  John McCarthy,et al.  Epistemological Problems of Artificial Intelligence , 1987, IJCAI.

[5]  Alan K. Mackworth Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Modeling Spatial Knowledge , 1978, IJCAI.

[7]  J Corbett,et al.  Topological principles in cartography , 1979 .

[8]  W. Chase,et al.  Cognitive Skill: Implications for Spatial Skill in Large-Scale Environments. , 1979 .

[9]  Marvin S. White,et al.  Technical Requirements and Standards for a Multipurpose Geographic Data System , 1984 .

[10]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Frank,et al.  Cell Graphs: A Provable Correct Method for the Storage of Geometry * , 1986 .

[12]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Expert systems: perils and promise , 1986, CACM.

[13]  Donna Peuquet,et al.  An algorithm to determine the directional relationship between arbitrarily-shaped polygons in the plane , 1987, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  A Formal Definition of Binary Topological Relationships , 1989, FODO.

[15]  Erland Jungert,et al.  The Design of Pictorial Databases Based Upon the Theory of Symbolic Projections , 1989, SSD.

[16]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  A Topological Data Model for Spatial Databases , 1990, SSD.

[17]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Complexity of query processing in databases with OR-objects , 1989, PODS '89.

[18]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The role of cognitive maps in spatial decisions , 1989 .

[19]  R. Maddux Some algebras and algorithms for reasoning about time and space , 1989 .

[20]  Joan M. Morrissey,et al.  Imprecise information and uncertainty in information systems , 1990, TOIS.

[21]  John L. Pfaltz,et al.  Summary of the final report of the NSF workshop on scientific database management , 1990, SGMD.

[22]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Cyc: toward programs with common sense , 1990, CACM.

[23]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Binary Topological Relations , 1991, SSD.

[24]  Daniel Hernández,et al.  Relative representation of spatial knowledge: the 2-D case , 1990, Forschungsberichte, TU Munich.

[25]  John R. Herring,et al.  The Mathematical Modeling of Spatial and Non-Spatial Information in Geographic Information Systems , 1991 .

[26]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[27]  SUH-YIN LEE,et al.  Spatial reasoning and similarity retrieval of images using 2D C-string knowledge representation , 1992, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  David N. Chin,et al.  Spatial-Linguistic Reasoning in LEI (Locality and Elevation Interpreter) , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[29]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Geographical data modeling , 1992 .

[30]  Terence R. Smith,et al.  Algebraic approach to spatial reasoning , 1992, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  People Manipulate Objects (but Cultivate Fields): Beyond the Raster-Vector Debate in GIS , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[32]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space , 1992, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[33]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Using Orientation Information for Qualitative Spatial Reasoning , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[34]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Modelling Spatial Relations and Operations with Partially Ordered Sets , 1993, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[35]  M. Egenhofer Pre-processing queries with spatial constraints , 1994 .