Consumer product chemical weight fractions from ingredient lists

Assessing human exposures to chemicals in consumer products requires composition information. However, comprehensive composition data for products in commerce are not generally available. Many consumer products have reported ingredient lists that are constructed using specific guidelines. A probabilistic model was developed to estimate quantitative weight fraction (WF) values that are consistent with the rank of an ingredient in the list, the number of reported ingredients, and labeling rules. The model provides the mean, median, and 95% upper and lower confidence limit WFs for ingredients of any rank in lists of any length. WFs predicted by the model compared favorably with those reported on Material Safety Data Sheets. Predictions for chemicals known to provide specific functions in products were also found to reasonably agree with reported WFs. The model was applied to a selection of publicly available ingredient lists, thereby estimating WFs for 1293 unique ingredients in 1123 products in 81 product categories. Predicted WFs, although less precise than reported values, can be estimated for large numbers of product–chemical combinations and thus provide a useful source of data for high-throughput or screening-level exposure assessments.

[1]  Peter Fantke,et al.  Exploring consumer exposure pathways and patterns of use for chemicals in the environment , 2015, Toxicology reports.

[2]  A. Roudot,et al.  Exposure method development for risk assessment to cosmetic products using a standard composition. , 2014, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Linking high resolution mass spectrometry data with exposure and toxicity forecasts to advance high-throughput environmental monitoring. , 2016, Environment international.

[4]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology. , 2016, Chemical research in toxicology.

[5]  Tao Hong,et al.  Characterization and prediction of chemical functions and weight fractions in consumer products , 2016, Toxicology reports.

[6]  Mark J. Bennett,et al.  The R Language for Statistical Computing , 2016 .

[7]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[8]  C M Grulke,et al.  Development of a consumer product ingredient database for chemical exposure screening and prioritization. , 2014, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[9]  Catherine Blake,et al.  Response to “Comment on ‘An Informatics Approach to Evaluating Combined Chemical Exposures from Consumer Products: A Case Study of Asthma-Associated Chemicals and Potential Endocrine Disruptors’” , 2016, Environmental health perspectives.

[10]  Ann Richard,et al.  Advancing Exposure Characterization for Chemical Evaluation and Risk Assessment , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[11]  Bas Bokkers,et al.  Validation of an aggregate exposure model for substances in consumer products: a case study of diethyl phthalate in personal care products , 2014, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[12]  J G M Van Engelen,et al.  Consumer exposure scenarios: development, challenges and possible solutions , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  Assessing the safety of co-exposure to food packaging migrants in food and water using the maximum cumulative ratio and an established decision tree , 2014, Food additives & contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, analysis, control, exposure & risk assessment.

[14]  Halûk Özkaynak,et al.  Computational Exposure Science: An Emerging Discipline to Support 21st-Century Risk Assessment , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[15]  Daniel Vallero,et al.  SHEDS-HT: an integrated probabilistic exposure model for prioritizing exposures to chemicals with near-field and dietary sources. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Suspect Screening Analysis of Chemicals in Consumer Products. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Christopher M Grulke,et al.  High-throughput screening of chemicals as functional substitutes using structure-based classification models. , 2017, Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC.