Some comments on magnetotelluric response function estimation

A new set of computational procedures are proposed for estimating the magnetotelluric response functions from time series of natural source electromagnetic field variations. These combine the remote reference method, which is effective at minimizing bias errors in the response, with robust processing, which is useful for removing contamination by outliers and other departures from Gauss-Markov optimality on regression estimates. In addition, a nonparametric jackknife estimator for the confidence limits on the response functions is introduced. The jackknife offers many advantages over conventional approaches, including robustness to heterogeneity of residual variance, relative insensitivity to correlations induced by the spectral analysis of finite data sequences, and computational simplicity. These techniques are illustrated using long-period magnetotelluric data from the EMSLAB Lincoln line. The paper concludes with a cautionary note about leverage effects by high power events in the dependent variables that are not necessarily removable by any robust method based on regression residuals.

[1]  G. Egbert,et al.  Multivariate analysis of geomagnetic array data. 1 The response space , 1989 .

[2]  Mario Martinez,et al.  Magnetotelluric observations across the Juan de Fuca Subduction System in the EMSLAB Project , 1989 .

[3]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  A comparison of techniques for magnetotelluric response function estimation , 1989 .

[4]  Peter J. Rousseeuw,et al.  Robust Regression and Outlier Detection , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[5]  Alan D. Chave,et al.  On the robust estimation of power spectra, coherences, and transfer functions , 1987 .

[6]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[7]  Rupert G. Miller Beyond ANOVA, basics of applied statistics , 1987 .

[8]  G. Egbert,et al.  Robust estimation of geomagnetic transfer functions , 1986 .

[9]  J. Clarke,et al.  Noise correlation lengths in remote reference magnetotellurics , 1984 .

[10]  G. Keller,et al.  Advanced theory of deep geomagnetic sounding , 1984 .

[11]  P. J. Huber Minimax Aspects of Bounded-Influence Regression: Rejoinder , 1983 .

[12]  B. Efron,et al.  A Leisurely Look at the Bootstrap, the Jackknife, and , 1983 .

[13]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife Estimate of Variance , 1981 .

[14]  J. Larsen Electromagnetic Response Functions from Interrupted and Noisy Data , 1980 .

[15]  Frederick R. Forst,et al.  On robust estimation of the location parameter , 1980 .

[16]  John Clarke,et al.  Magnetotellurics with a remote magnetic reference , 1979 .

[17]  John Clarke,et al.  Magnetotelluric data analysis; removal of bias , 1978 .

[18]  R. Welsch,et al.  The Hat Matrix in Regression and ANOVA , 1978 .

[19]  D. Thomson Spectrum estimation techniques for characterization and development of WT4 waveguide–I , 1977, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[20]  D. Hinkley Jackknifing in Unbalanced Situations , 1977 .

[21]  D. V. Hinkley,et al.  Jackknife confidence limits using Student t approximations , 1977 .

[22]  F. X. Bostick,et al.  THE ESTIMATION OF MAGNETOTELLURIC IMPEDANCE TENSOR ELEMENTS FROM MEASURED DATA , 1971 .

[23]  David R. Brillinger,et al.  Statistical Methods of Econometrics. , 1967 .

[24]  D. Darling,et al.  A Test of Goodness of Fit , 1954 .

[25]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes , 1952 .

[26]  Olav Reiersöl,et al.  Confluence analysis by means of instrumental sets of variables , 1945 .