When Elementary Schools Stay Open Late: Results From the National Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program

This article presents evidence from a national evaluation of the effects of 21st Century Community Learning Center afterschool programs. The study was conducted in 12 school districts and 26 after-school centers, at which 2,308 elementary school students who were interested in attending a center were randomly assigned either to the treatment or control group. The findings indicate that the programs affected the type of care and supervision students received after school, with parents less likely to be caring for their child and other adults more likely, but there was no statistically significant effect on the incidence of self-care. Students in the program reported feeling safer after school, but their academic outcomes were not affected and they had more incidents of negative behavior.

[1]  M. Dynarski,et al.  When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. New Findings. Executive Summary. , 2004 .

[2]  Olatokunbo S. Fashola.  Review of Extended-Day and After-School Programs and Their Effectiveness. Report No. 24. , 1998 .

[3]  Howard S. Bloom,et al.  Accounting for No-Shows in Experimental Evaluation Designs , 1984 .

[4]  R. Rossi,et al.  Schools Serving Family Needs: Extended-Day Programs in Public and Private Schools. Issue Brief. , 1997 .

[5]  P. Simon.  Community Programs to Promote Youth Development , 2005 .

[6]  D. Vandell,et al.  The relation between third graders' after-school care and social, academic, and emotional functioning. , 1988, Child development.

[7]  When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. New Findings. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research , 2004 .

[8]  Mary Jo Nolin,et al.  Before- and After-School Care, Programs, and Activities of Children in Kindergarten through Eighth Grade: 2001. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2004-008. , 2004 .

[9]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Community Programs To Promote Youth Development. , 2002 .

[10]  D. Vandell,et al.  The Study of Promising After-School Programs: Examination of Intermediate Outcomes in Year 2 , 2005 .

[11]  Mark Dynarski,et al.  A Broader View: The National Evaluation of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program. Design Report, Volume II: Instruments. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research , 2001 .

[12]  Mark Dynarski,et al.  When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program, First Year Findings , 2005 .

[13]  Joop J. Hox,et al.  Item Nonresponse in Questionnaire Research with Children , 2001 .

[14]  P. Amato.  Interviewing children about their families: A note on data quality. , 1987 .

[15]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  Promoting Healthy Adolescents: Synthesis of Youth Development Program Evaluations , 1998 .

[16]  N. Borgers,et al.  Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality 1 , 2000 .

[17]  Joseph P. Tierney.  Making a Difference. An Impact Study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. , 1995 .

[18]  R. Hollister.  The Growth In After-School Programs And Their Impact , 2003 .

[19]  Kerry J. Gruber,et al.  Schools and Staffing Survey, 1999-2000: Overview of the Data for Public, Private, Public Charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs Elementary and Secondary Schools. E.D. Tabs. , 2002 .

[20]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[21]  R. Levine,et al.  The Measurement of Instructional Background Indicators: Cognitive Laboratory Investigations of the Responses of Fourth and Eighth Grade Students and Teachers to Questionnaire Items. Working Paper Series. , 2002 .