Illusions of verticality in weightlessness

SummaryIn weightlessness most subjects feel themselves, and see the visual surroundings, in either an upright or an upside-down orientation although the gravitational force vector is missing. According to a theory of gravity perception, these illusions of positional and visual verticality are assumed to be caused by the force-independent z-axis bias of vestibular and somatic graviceptors. This hypothesis is tested by comparison of measurements of the joint bias in normal gravity with reports of probands in space flight. The expected correlations between the sign of the biases and the occurrence of the respective illusions appear in fact to exist, as well as a negative correlation to incidences of space sickness. If confirmed in a larger sample, the presumed dependency may eventually afford a predictive test of both phenomena.

[1]  Horst Mittelstaedt.  Subjective vertical in weightlessness , 1985 .

[2]  H Mittelstaedt.  Determinants of space perception in space flight. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[3]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  Somatic versus Vestibular Gravity Reception in Man , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S Glasauer,et al.  Determinants of orientation in microgravity. , 1992, Acta astronautica.

[5]  S G Diamond,et al.  Otolith function in hypo- and hypergravity: relation to space motion sickness. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[6]  J. Lackner,et al.  Sense of Body Position in Parabolic Flight a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  W. Levelt,et al.  Spatial reference in weightlessness: Perceptual factors and mental representations , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  L. R. Young,et al.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 1. Sensory adaptation to weightlessness and readaptation to one-g: an overview , 1983, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  E I Matsnev,et al.  Space motion sickness: phenomenology, countermeasures, and mechanisms. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  S. Ellis.  Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments , 1991 .

[11]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The role of the pitched-up orientation of the otoliths in two recent models of the subjective vertical. , 1989, Biological cybernetics.

[12]  H. Mittelstaedt.  The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[13]  H Mittelstaedt,et al.  The relative effect of saccular and somatosensory information on spatial perception and control. , 1988, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[14]  Charles M. Oman,et al.  Space motion sickness: Symptoms, stimuli and predictability , 1983 .

[15]  Horst Mittelstaedt.  Interactions of form and orientation , 1991 .

[16]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  The information processing structure of the subjective vertical. A cybernetic bridge between its psychophysics and its neurobiology , 1988 .

[17]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Inflight and postflight results on the causation of inversion illusion and space sickness , 1987 .

[18]  H. Mittelstaedt.  A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical , 1983, Naturwissenschaften.

[19]  S G Diamond,et al.  Prediction of space motion sickness susceptibility by disconjugate eye torsion in parabolic flight. , 1991, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.