A Topology-Adaptive Deep Model for Power System Multifault Diagnosis

Quickly identifying faulty sections is tremendously important for power systems, yet challenging due to handling the variations of complex alarm patterns. Existing works have focused on finding fault section clues solely from alarm information (and ignoring power system topology information). So they are only sensitive to alarms from power systems with pre-assumed topology structures, and encounter difficulties when a system’s topology changes. To adapt to unknown or varying system topologies, here we present a Topology-Adaptive Deep Model (TADM) for power system multifault diagnosis. TADM mines the underlying mapping from alarm and topology information to each section’s fault status. It consists of a deep iterative network (DIN), a one-layer fully connected network (FCN), and section-wise multifault diagnosis (SWMD) subnetwork. TADM first models a fault power system as a graph, from which DIN iteratively integrates the alarm and topology information in the region from each node to its T -hop neighbors, and learns their local correlation. Limited to T ’s size, FCN then combines all local correlations to determine the global correlation between alarm and topology information across the entire power system. To implement multifault diagnosis, learned local and global correlations serve as topology-related fault representations for input as an SWMD (to predict all sections’ fault states one by one). A comprehensive experimental study demonstrates that TADM outperforms state-of-the-art models in both multifault diagnosis and adapting to system topologies. The source code of the TADM is available onlline1.

[1]  Jose Roberto Sanches Mantovani,et al.  Fault section estimation in electric power systems using an optimization immune algorithm , 2010 .

[2]  Xiangning Lin,et al.  A Fault Diagnosis Method of Power Systems Based on Improved Objective Function and Genetic Algorithm-Tabu Search , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[3]  Wen-Hui Chen,et al.  Fault Section Estimation Using Fuzzy Matrix-Based Reasoning Methods , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[4]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  A fuzzy Petri net based approach for fault diagnosis in power systems considering temporal constraints , 2016 .

[5]  Yixin Zhao,et al.  Intelligent online catastrophe assessment and preventive control via a stacked denoising autoencoder , 2020, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Euan M. Davidson,et al.  Flexible Model-Based Alarm Processing for Protection Performance Assessment and Incident Identification , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  M. Kezunovic,et al.  Implementing Fuzzy Reasoning Petri-Nets for Fault Section Estimation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[8]  Jie Cao,et al.  Detecting Prosumer-Community Groups in Smart Grids From the Multiagent Perspective , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[9]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[10]  Xiang Ren,et al.  Empower Sequence Labeling with Task-Aware Neural Language Model , 2017, AAAI.

[11]  Hong-Tzer Yang,et al.  Power system distributed on-line fault section estimation using decision tree based neural nets approach , 1995 .

[12]  Yixin Ni,et al.  An on-line distributed intelligent fault section estimation system for large-scale power networks , 2002 .

[13]  Zhu Yongli,et al.  Bayesian networks-based approach for power systems fault diagnosis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[14]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  An Analytic Model for Fault Diagnosis in Power Systems Utilizing Redundancy and Temporal Information of Alarm Messages , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  H.H. Zurn,et al.  Application of neural-network modules to electric power system fault section estimation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[16]  Thomas Lukasiewicz,et al.  Tag-Aware Personalized Recommendation Using a Deep-Semantic Similarity Model with Negative Sampling , 2016, CIKM.

[17]  Zhao Yang Dong,et al.  Power system fault diagnosis based on history driven differential evolution and stochastic time domain simulation , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[18]  J.R. McDonald,et al.  Applying multi-agent system technology in practice: automated management and analysis of SCADA and digital fault recorder data , 2006, 2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[19]  Junzhou Luo,et al.  A local random walk model for complex networks based on discriminative feature combinations , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..