Absolute-Pitch Judgments of Black and White-Key Pitches

Absolute-pitch possessors have been reported to identify black-key pitches less quickly and accurately than they identify white-key pitches. However, it is possible in these experiments that the greater speed of identifying white-compared with black-key pitches was due to a motor response bias because the motor requirements for indicating a black-key pitch were more difficult than those for indicating a white-key pitch. The greater accuracy in identifying white-compared with black-key pitches may have been due to a choice response bias favoring white-key pitch responses. We compared absolute- pitch judgments of black-and white-key pitches in a task free of motor response biases. Subjects compared the pitch of an auditory tone with a visually presented pitch name and responded Same or Different. The absolute- pitch possessors responded significantly more slowly to black- key auditory pitches, and to black- key visual pitch names, than to white-key pitches and pitch names. These differences may have been due to perceptual and retrieval processes associated with the frequencies with which black-and white-key pitches and pitch names occur in music literature. Another possible explanation is that absolute-pitch possessors may learn absolute pitch for only white-key pitches in development and may interpolate blackkey pitches from neighboring white-key pitches. Experiments to test these alternative accounts are proposed.

[1]  K. Miyazaki.  Absolute Pitch Identification: Effects of Timbre and Pitch Region , 1989 .

[2]  J. M. Troost,et al.  Ascending and Descending Melodic Intervals: Statistical Findings and Their Perceptual Relevance , 1989 .

[3]  K. Miyazaki.  Musical pitch identification by absolute pitch possessors , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[5]  Derek Besner,et al.  Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. , 1987 .

[6]  P. Howell,et al.  Musical structure and cognition , 1985 .

[7]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Melodic Structure and Note Transition Probabilities: A Content Analysis of 15,618 Classical Themes , 1984 .

[8]  W. Siegel,et al.  Absolute identification of notes and intervals by musicians , 1977 .

[9]  John B. Carroll,et al.  Speed and Accuracy of Absolute Pitch Judgments: Some Latter-Day Results. , 1975 .

[10]  G. Harris,et al.  Categorical perception and absolute pitch , 1975 .

[11]  Thomas B. Jeffries.  Relationship of interval frequency count to ratings of melodic intervals. , 1974 .

[12]  John M. Chowning,et al.  The Synthesis of Complex Audio Spectra by Means of Frequency Modulation , 1973 .

[13]  D. Sergeant,et al.  Perceptual Shifts in the Auditory Information Processing of Young Children , 1973 .

[14]  W. D. Ward.  Absolute Pitch. Part II , 1963 .

[15]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Interaural Phase and the Absolute Threshold for Tone , 1962 .

[16]  R. Lambert,et al.  Shock‐Wave Transducer Calibration , 1962 .

[17]  J. Youngblood.  Style as Information , 1958 .

[18]  J. Baird.  Memory for Absolute Pitch. , 1917 .

[19]  E. F. Copp.  MUSICAL ABILITYBases of it Inherited by Nearly Everyone—Difference in Ability Due More to Training Than to Heredity—Means for Bringing Latent Ability Into Expression , 1916 .