Estimating causal effects.

Although one goal of aetiologic epidemiology is to estimate ‘the true effect’ of an exposure on disease occurrence, epidemiologists usually do not precisely specify what ‘true effect’ they want to estimate. We describe how the counterfactual theory of causation, originally developed in philosophy and statistics, can be adapted to epidemiological studies to provide precise answers to the questions ‘What is a cause?’, ‘How should we measure effects?’ and ‘What effect measure should epidemiologists estimate in aetiologic studies?’ We also show that the theory of counterfactuals (1) provides a general framework for designing and analysing aetiologic studies; (2) shows that we must always depend on a substitution step when estimating effects, and therefore the validity of our estimate will always depend on the validity of the substitution; (3) leads to precise definitions of effect measure, confounding, confounder, and effect-measure modification; and (4) shows why effect measures should be expected to vary across populations whenever the distribution of causal factors varies across the populations.

[1]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Commentary: Estimating causal effects , 2002 .

[2]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Commentary: Counterfactuals: help or hindrance? , 2002 .

[3]  G. Shafer.  Commentary: Estimating causal effects , 2002 .

[4]  Commentary: Population versus individual level causal effects , 2002 .

[5]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Estimating causal effects. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  D B Rubin,et al.  Estimating the causal effects of smoking , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Confounding in health research. , 2001, Annual review of public health.

[8]  D. Rubin,et al.  Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariates , 2000 .

[9]  S. Greenland.  Causal Analysis in the Health Sciences , 2000 .

[10]  Jerome P. Reiter.  Using Statistics to Determine Causal Relationships , 2000, Am. Math. Mon..

[11]  J. Robins,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Selection bias and unmeasured Confounding in missing Data and Causal inference models , 2000 .

[12]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Causal inference without counterfactuals (with Discussion) , 2000 .

[13]  R J Little,et al.  Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[14]  S Greenland,et al.  Random-effects meta-analyses are not always conservative. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Christopher Winship,et al.  THE ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM OBSERVATIONAL DATA , 1999 .

[16]  J. Pearl,et al.  Confounding and Collapsibility in Causal Inference , 1999 .

[17]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[18]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[19]  James M. Robins,et al.  Causal Inference from Complex Longitudinal Data , 1997 .

[20]  S. Greenland.  Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference. , 1996 .

[21]  J. Pearl.  Causal diagrams for empirical research , 1995 .

[22]  M. Sobel.  Causal Inference in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 1995 .

[23]  S Greenland,et al.  Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  I Olkin,et al.  Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods". , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[25]  R. Penrose,et al.  Shadows of the Mind , 1994 .

[26]  S Greenland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models. , 1993, Biometrics.

[27]  D B Rubin,et al.  Practical implications of modes of statistical inference for causal effects and the critical role of the assignment mechanism. , 1991, Biometrics.

[28]  H. Morgenstern,et al.  Standardized regression coefficients: a further critique and review of some alternatives. , 1991, Epidemiology.

[29]  Sander Greenland,et al.  On the Logical Justification of Conditional Tests for Two-By-Two Contingency Tables , 1991 .

[30]  D. Rubin.  [On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9.] Comment: Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies , 1990 .

[31]  S Greenland,et al.  Randomization, Statistics, and Causal Inference , 1990, Epidemiology.

[32]  S Greenland,et al.  The probability of causation under a stochastic model for individual risk. , 1989, Biometrics.

[33]  S Greenland,et al.  Interpretation and choice of effect measures in epidemiologic analyses. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  J M Robins,et al.  Identifiability, exchangeability, and epidemiological confounding. , 1986, International journal of epidemiology.

[35]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[36]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  Sensitivity Analyses Would Help , 1985 .

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[38]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[39]  L. Fisher,et al.  Matching and unrelatedness. , 1974, American journal of epidemiology.

[40]  D. Rubin.  Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. , 1974 .

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  Cause and Counterfactual , 1966 .