Benzophenone 4: an emerging allergen in cosmetics and toiletries?

Chemical ultraviolet (UV) filters have, over the last few decades, been increasingly used not only in conventional sunscreen products but also in many cosmetics and toiletries. Allergic contact dermatitis as well as photoallergic contact dermatitis reactions have been well documented as a consequence of such use. Over a 3‐year period, we recorded the number of positive patch test reactions to a selection of chemical UV filters that we added to our usual cosmetics/facial series. Our objective was to investigate whether any of these filters produced significant numbers of positive patch test results in the absence of photostimulation. Our results show that not only did benzophenone 4 (2‐hydroxy‐4‐methoxybenzophenone‐5‐sulphonic acid: sulisobenzone) produce significantly more positive patch test results than the other UV filters that were tested, but also it was the third most frequently positive result overall. Our findings would support the inclusion of benzophenone 4 when patch testing to investigate likely contact dermatitis from cosmetics and toiletries.

[1]  R. Katugampola,et al.  A review of allergens found in current hair‐care products , 2005, Contact dermatitis.

[2]  T. Agner,et al.  Augmentation of skin response by exposure to a combination of allergens and irritants – a review , 2004, Contact dermatitis.

[3]  J. Johansen,et al.  Methyldibromoglutaronitrile in rinse‐off products causes allergic contact dermatitis: an experimental study , 2004, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  S. Nedorost Facial erythema as a result of benzophenone allergy. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  T. Agner,et al.  Combined effects of irritants and allergens , 2002, Contact dermatitis.

[6]  J. Hawk,et al.  Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  T. Estlander,et al.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from benzophenone‐4 in hair‐care products , 2001, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  H. Benson Assessment and Clinical Implications of Absorption of Sunscreens Across Skin , 2000, American journal of clinical dermatology.

[9]  B. Berne,et al.  7 years experience of photopatch testing with sunscreen allergens in Sweden. , 1998 .

[10]  S. Schauder,et al.  Contact and photocontact sensitivity to sunscreens , 1997, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  A. Tosti,et al.  Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto ed Ambientali Italian Multicenter Study of Allergic Contact Photodermatitis: epidemiological aspects. , 1996, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[12]  P. Pigatto Italian multicenter study of allergic contact photodermatitis: epidemiological aspects , 1995 .

[13]  A. Moreau,et al.  Photocontact allergy to oxybenzone: ten years of experience. , 1994, Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine.

[14]  R. Marks,et al.  The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population‐based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia , 1993, The British journal of dermatology.

[15]  Sterling Gb Sunscreens: a review. , 1992 .

[16]  L. Vaillant,et al.  Contact and photocontact allergy to oxybenzone * , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[17]  G. Sterling,et al.  Sunscreens: a review. , 1992, Cutis.

[18]  V. Deleo,et al.  Photoallergy to benzophenone. , 1989, Archives of dermatology.

[19]  J. English,et al.  Sensitivity to sunscreens , 1987, Contact dermatitis.