Emphatic speech style mdash; with special focus on the prosodic signalling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation

Abstract After a review of previous work on the prosody of emotional involvement, data extracts from natural conversations are analyzed in order to argue for the constitution of an ‘emphatic (speech) style’, which linguistic devices are used to signal heightened emotive involvement. Participants use prosodic cues, in co-occurrence with syntactic and lexical cues, to contextualize turn-constructional units as ‘emphatic’. Only realizations of prosodic categories that are marked in relation to surrounding uses of these categories have the power to contextualize units as displaying ‘more-than-normal involvement’. In the appropriate context, and in co-occurrence with syntactic and lexical cues and sequential position, the context-sensitive interpretation of this involvement is ‘emphasis’. Prosodic marking is used in addition to various unmarked cues that signal and constitute different activity types in conversation. Emphatic style highlights and reinforms particular conversational activities, and makes certain types of recipient responses locally relevant. In particular, switches from non-emphatic to emphatic style are used to contextualize ‘peaks of involvement’ or ‘climaxes’ in story-telling. These are shown in the paper to be ‘staged’ by speakers and treated by recipients as marked activities calling for displays of alignment with respect to the matter at hand. Signals of emphasis are deployable as techniques for locally organizing demonstrations of shared understanding and participant reciprocity in conversational interaction.

[1]  K. Kohler.  Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen , 1981 .

[2]  M. Selting.  Prosodie im Gespräch : Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation , 1995 .

[3]  H. Lausberg,et al.  Handbuch der Literarischen Rhetorik , 1960 .

[4]  Horst Arndt,et al.  Verbal, prosodic, and kinesic emotive contrasts in speech , 1991 .

[5]  G. Jefferson,et al.  The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’ , 1981 .

[6]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Papers on Language and Context. Working Papers of the Language Behavior Research Laboratory, No. 46. , 1976 .

[7]  P. Auer,et al.  On the contextualizing function of speech rhythm in conversation: Question-answer sequences , 1991 .

[8]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Discourse strategies: Prosody in conversation , 1982 .

[9]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[10]  J. M. Atkinson.  Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[11]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon , 1992 .

[12]  John J. Gumperz,et al.  Contextualization and Understanding , 1989 .

[13]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Der stand der Forschung zur deutschen Satzintonation , 1980 .

[14]  D. Bolinger.  Intonation and Its Parts , 1985 .

[15]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[16]  Margret Selting.  The role of intonation in the organization of repair and problem handling sequences in conversation , 1988 .

[17]  Sheldon B. Michaels,et al.  Some Aspects of Fundamental Frequency and Envelope Amplitude as Related to the Emotional Content of Speech , 1962 .

[18]  P. Auer.  Rhythm in telephone closings , 1990 .

[19]  David Crystal,et al.  Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English , 1969 .

[20]  J. O'connor.  Intonation Of Colloquial English , 1961 .

[21]  H. O. Coleman.  Intonation and emphasis , 1914 .

[22]  Peter Auer,et al.  Introduction: John Gumperz’ Approach to Contextualization , 1992 .

[23]  M. Selting,et al.  Stil und Stilisierung , 1989 .

[24]  E. Couper-Kuhlen.  An introduction to English prosody , 1986 .

[25]  C. Goodwin.  Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments , 1986 .

[26]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints , 1978, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[27]  E. Schegloff.  Discourse as an interactional achievement : Some uses of "Uh huh" and other things that come between sentences , 1982 .

[28]  Dell Hymes,et al.  Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking: Ways of Speaking , 1989 .

[29]  D. Ladd.  The structure of intonational meaning , 1978 .

[30]  Barbara Sandig.  Stilistik der deutschen Sprache , 1986 .

[31]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Structures of Social Action: Notes on story structure and the organization of participation , 1985 .

[32]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[33]  Peter Auer,et al.  The contextualization of language , 1992 .

[34]  Otto von Essen,et al.  Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation , 1956 .

[35]  W. Klein.  Einige Bemerkungen zur Frageintonation , 1982 .

[36]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Assessments and the Construction of Context , 1992 .

[37]  Susanne Uhmann.  Contextualizing Relevance: On Some Forms and Functions of Speech Rate Changes in Everyday Conversation , 1992 .

[38]  M. Selting,et al.  Prosody in conversational questions , 1992 .

[39]  E. Uldall,et al.  Dimensions of Meaning in Intonation , 1972 .