Performance Enhancement of a Dynamic System Using PID Controller Tuning Formulae

The proportional integral derivative (PID) controller is the most dominant form of automatic controller in industrial use today. With this technique, it is necessary to adjust the controller parameters according to the nature of the process. Thus, for effective control of a HVDC system, for example, specific values need to be chosen for the P, I and D parameters, which will be different for the values required to control, for example, an induction motor drive. This tailoring of controller to process is known as controller tuning. Controller tuning is easily and effectively performed using tuning rules (i.e. formulae for controller tuning, based on process information). Such tuning rules allow the easy set up of controllers to achieve optimum performance at commissioning. Importantly, they allow ease of recommissioning if the characteristics of the process change. The paper communicates the results of recent work in the collation of industry-relevant PI and PID controller tuning rules, which may be applied to a variety of applications in power electronics, machines and drives.

[1]  K.R. Padiyar,et al.  Modelling, control design and analysis of VSC based HVDC transmission systems , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Power System Technology, 2004. PowerCon 2004..

[2]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Benchmark systems for PID control , 2000 .

[3]  J. Álvarez-Ramírez,et al.  A stable design of PI control for DC-DC converters with an RHS zero , 2001 .

[4]  Sigeru Omatu,et al.  Improvement of speed control performance using PID type neurocontroller in an electric vehicle system , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'94).

[5]  Annraoi M. de Paor,et al.  A Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration of The Ziegler–Nichols PID Controller , 1993 .

[6]  A. Callender,et al.  Time-Lag in a Control System , 1936 .

[7]  J. G. Ziegler,et al.  Optimum Settings for Automatic Controllers , 1942, Journal of Fluids Engineering.

[8]  Aidan O'Dwyer,et al.  Handbook of PI and PID controller tuning rules , 2003 .

[9]  Shyh Hong Hwang,et al.  Process identification and control based on dominant pole expansions , 1994 .

[10]  Douglas Rayner Hartree,et al.  Time-Lag in a Control System. II , 1937 .

[11]  Faa-Jeng Lin,et al.  Robust two-degrees-of-freedom control for induction motor servodrive , 1995 .

[12]  K.P. Wong,et al.  A fuzzy logic controller for permanent magnet synchronous machine-a sliding mode approach , 1993, Conference Record of the Power Conversion Conference - Yokohama 1993.

[13]  Pradipta Kishore Dash,et al.  A fuzzy variable structure current controller for flexible AC transmission systems , 2002, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition.

[14]  David Pessen,et al.  A New Look at PID-Controller Tuning , 1994 .

[15]  Kwang-Hee Nam,et al.  A PI type dead-time compensation method for vector controlled GTO inverters , 1996, IAS '96. Conference Record of the 1996 IEEE Industry Applications Conference Thirty-First IAS Annual Meeting.