Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture

The classical theory for hydraulic fracturing stress measurements assumes an ideal case with a linear elastic, homogenous, and isotropic medium; and a fracture that reopens distinctly when the minimum tangential borehole stress is exceeded. The induced fracture disturbs this ideal picture in several aspects, which are important for the evaluation of the maximum horizontal principal stress using the fracture reopening pressure. This disturbance can be attributed to the fracture normal stiffness and the initial hydraulic fracture permeability. In this paper, the hydraulic fracturing reopening test is studied by coupled hydromechanical modeling that takes into account an induced fracture that is incompletely closed. The result shows that with realistic equipment compliance, the apparent fracture reopening evaluated from the well-pressure is close to the magnitude of the minimum horizontal principal stress with little or no correlation to the maximum horizontal principal stress. This observation suggests that the determination of maximum principal stress by hydraulic fracturing using the reopening pressure is very uncertain.

[1]  W. S. Keys,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing to determine the regional in situ stress field, Piceance Basin, Colorado , 1976 .

[2]  Masahiro Iwano,et al.  Hydromechanical characteristics of a single rock joint , 1995 .

[3]  Bezalel C. Haimson,et al.  Statistical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing stress measurement parameters , 1989 .

[4]  Paul A. Witherspoon,et al.  Theoretical and field studies of coupled hydromechanical behaviour of fractured rocks—1. Development and verification of a numerical simulator , 1992 .

[5]  G. Richard,et al.  The mechanical properties of joints , 1974 .

[6]  J. S. Y. Wang,et al.  Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Technical information report No. 23 , 1979 .

[7]  N. Barton,et al.  FUNDAMENTALS OF ROCK JOINT DEFORMATION , 1983 .

[8]  N. Morgenstern,et al.  Interpretation of hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure , 1993 .

[9]  M. Biot.  General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[10]  Nobuo Morita,et al.  Borehole breakdown pressure with drilling fluids—II. Semi-analytical solution to predict borehole breakdown pressure , 1996 .

[11]  Bezalel C. Haimson,et al.  Laboratory study of hydraulic fracturing pressure data—how valid is their conventional interpretation? , 1989 .

[12]  Takatoshi Ito,et al.  Two methods for hydraulic fracturing stress measurements needless the ambiguous reopening pressure , 1997 .

[13]  J. L. Ratigan,et al.  The use of the fracture reopening pressure in hydraulic fracturing stress measurements , 1992 .

[14]  Ove Stephansson,et al.  New developments in hydrofracturing stress measurements at Luleå university of technology , 1989 .