Evaluation of Layout Designs Taking into Account Workers’ Fatigue

It is known that the workers’ fatigue can greatly affect both industrial performances and the workers’ well-being at work. Consequently, when designing a manufacturing system, managers are interested in facility layouts that favor performance objectives, while avoiding excessive fatigue. Unfortunately, most existing studies related to layout design focus on technical aspects of the considered system (e.g. flow costs, distance between machines, etc.) so that human factors, in particular fatigue, are insufficiently taken into consideration. Therefore, we are interested in how the workers’ fatigue can be taken into account when evaluating possible layout designs. We analyze the factors that induce fatigue, which are mainly concerned with the work arduousness, and depend on the layout. We explain how they can be considered in order to compare possible solutions of a layout problem. In such a context, emphasis is put on the role of simulation. We illustrate our purpose and highlight the importance of taking fatigue into consideration through a comparison, using simulation, of two different layouts of a job-shop system. The comparison is based both on the mean flowtime of jobs and how the workers’ fatigue evolves over time.

[1]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  Taking Into Account Workers’ Fatigue in Production Tasks: A Combined Simulation Framework , 2018 .

[2]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  Dealing with Capacitated Aisles in Facility Layout: A Simulation Optimization Approach , 2018, SOCO-CISIS-ICEUTE.

[3]  L. Berrah,et al.  Information aggregation in industrial performance measurement: rationales, issues and definitions , 2004 .

[4]  Giovanni Mummolo,et al.  The effect of dynamic worker behavior on flow line performance , 2009 .

[5]  Franz Rendl,et al.  A computational study and survey of methods for the single-row facility layout problem , 2013, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[6]  S. Darmoul,et al.  Manufacturing configuration selection under arduous working conditions : A multi-criteria decision approach , 2015 .

[7]  Latif Salum,et al.  Using the when/where rules in dual resource constrained systems for a hybrid push-pull control , 2009 .

[8]  Daria Battini,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of assembly lines with workers fatigue consideration , 2018 .

[9]  Gien Denis,et al.  Human behavior and social network simulation: fuzzy sets/logic and agents-based approach , 2007, SpringSim '07.

[10]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ergonomics in assembly line balancing based on energy expenditure: a multi-objective model , 2016 .

[11]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Assembly line balancing with ergonomics paradigms: two alternative methods , 2015 .

[12]  Xin Tan,et al.  Research on Dynamic Facility Layout Problem of Manufacturing Unit Considering Human Factors , 2018 .

[13]  Gunter P. Sharp,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative indices for the plant layout evaluation problem , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Da Ruan,et al.  Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  A web based tool for dynamic job rotation scheduling using multiple criteria , 2011 .

[16]  Thierry Moyaux,et al.  A bi-objective model in sustainable dynamic cell formation problem with skill-based worker assignment , 2016 .

[17]  Mohammed Bani Younis,et al.  Effect of Mechanical Vibrations on Human Body , 2016 .

[18]  Yeong-Dae Kim,et al.  Layout planning for facilities with fixed shapes and input and output points , 2000 .

[19]  Pingyu Jiang,et al.  RFID-based wireless manufacturing for walking-worker assembly islands with fixed-position layouts , 2007 .

[20]  Chun Hung Cheng,et al.  Recent advances in dynamic facility layout research , 2018, INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res..

[21]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  A simulation-optimization based heuristic for the online assignment of multi-skilled workers subjected to fatigue in manufacturing systems , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Dynamic job rotation for workload balancing in human based assembly systems , 2010 .

[23]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  Incorporating human fatigue and recovery into the learning–forgetting process , 2013 .

[24]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  Facility layout problems: A survey , 2007, Annu. Rev. Control..

[25]  Nicola Zelano Pénibilité au travail : élaboration d'un guide diagnostique méthodologique , 2014 .

[26]  A. Subash Babu,et al.  Evaluation of reconfigured manufacturing systems: an AHP framework , 2009 .

[27]  Andrei. Borshchev,et al.  The Big Book of Simulation Modeling: Multimethod Modeling with Anylogic 6 , 2013 .

[28]  Aicha Ferjani,et al.  Prise en compte de la fatigue des opérateurs dans la modélisation et la simulation des systèmes de production , 2019 .

[29]  S. Konz Work/rest: Part II – The scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide1 , 2000 .