Supplemental subjective testing to evaluate the performance of image and video quality estimators

The subjective tests used to evaluate image and video quality estimators (QEs) are expensive and time consuming. More problematic, the majority of subjective testing is not designed to find systematic weaknesses in the evaluated QEs. As a result, a motivated attacker can take advantage of these systematic weaknesses to gain unfair monetary advantage. In this paper, we draw on some lessons of software testing to propose additional testing procedures that target a specific QE under test. These procedures supplement, but do not replace, the traditional subjective testing procedures that are currently used. The goal is to motivate the design of objective QEs which are better able to accurately characterize human quality assessment.

[1]  Christian Keimel,et al.  Improving the verification process of video quality metrics , 2009, 2009 International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience.

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  No-reference image and video quality estimation: Applications and human-motivated design , 2010, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[4]  Michael H. Brill,et al.  Accuracy and cross-calibration of video quality metrics: new methods from ATIS/T1A1 , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[5]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: a methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[6]  Li Dong,et al.  Visual distortion gauge based on discrimination of noticeable contrast changes , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Structural Similarity Quality Metrics in a Coding Context: Exploring the Space of Realistic Distortions , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Subjective quality assessment IRCCyN/IVC database , 2004 .

[12]  Sheila S. Hemami,et al.  VSNR: A Wavelet-Based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.