Phase II trial of lomustine plus temozolomide chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: UKT-03.

PURPOSE To evaluate toxicity and efficacy of the combination of lomustine, temozolomide (TMZ) and involved-field radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-one adult patients (median Karnofsky performance score 90; median age, 51 years) accrued in two centers received involved-field radiotherapy (60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions) and chemotherapy with lomustine 100 mg/m2 (day 1) and TMZ 100 mg/m2/d (days 2 to 6) with individual dose adjustments according to hematologic toxicity. RESULTS A median of five courses (range, one to six courses) were delivered. WHO grade 4 hematotoxicity was observed in five patients (16%) and one of these patients died as a result of septicemia. Nonhematologic toxicity included one patient with WHO grade 4 drug-induced hepatitis (leading to discontinuation of lomustine and TMZ) and one patient with WHO grade 2 lung fibrosis (leading to discontinuation of lomustine). The progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months was 61.3%. The median PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 11.7 months), the median overall survival time (MST) was 22.6 months (95% CI, 12.5 to not assessable), the 2-year survival rate was 44.7%. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene-promoter methylation in the tumor tissue was associated with longer PFS (P = .014, log-rank test) and MST (P = .037). CONCLUSION The combination of lomustine, TMZ, and radiotherapy had acceptable toxicity and yielded promising survival data in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. MGMT gene-promoter methylation was a strong predictor of survival.

[1]  A. Omuro,et al.  Salvage temozolomide for prior temozolomide responders , 2005, Cancer.

[2]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Temozolomide in combination with BCNU before and after radiotherapy in patients with inoperable newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  V. Rigau,et al.  A dose finding phase I study of temozolomide (TMZ) and BCNU combined regimen (TEMOBIC) as a treatment of high grade glioma (HGG) in adult chemo-naïve patients , 2005 .

[4]  D. Misailidou,et al.  Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Wolter,et al.  Frequent promoter hypermethylation and low expression of the MGMT gene in oligodendroglial tumors , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[8]  J. Raizer,et al.  Phase 1 study of 28-day, low-dose temozolomide and BCNU in the treatment of malignant gliomas after radiation therapy. , 2004, Neuro-oncology.

[9]  J. Dichgans,et al.  One week on/one week off: A novel active regimen of temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma , 2004, Neurology.

[10]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase II study of neoadjuvant 1, 3‐bis (2‐chloroethyl)‐1‐nitrosourea and temozolomide for newly diagnosed anaplastic glioma , 2004, Cancer.

[11]  G. Weiss,et al.  A Randomized Phase I and Pharmacological Trial of Sequences of 1,3-bis(2-Chloroethyl)-1-Nitrosourea and Temozolomide in Patients with Advanced Solid Neoplasms , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase 2 study of BCNU and temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: North American Brain Tumor Consortium study. , 2004, Neuro-oncology.

[13]  M. Weller,et al.  Neuro-Oncology Working Group 01 trial of nimustine plus teniposide versus nimustine plus cytarabine chemotherapy in addition to involved-field radiotherapy in the first-line treatment of malignant glioma. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  L. Stewart,et al.  Chemotherapy in adult high-grade glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 12 randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[15]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase III trial of accelerated hyperfractionation with or without difluromethylornithine (DFMO) versus standard fractionated radiotherapy with or without DFMO for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Scar,et al.  Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Prados,et al.  A phase I trial of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea plus temozolomide: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium study. , 2000, Neuro-oncology.

[18]  M J Gleason,et al.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Malignant glioma: Who benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy? , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[20]  W. Curran,et al.  Validation and predictive power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis classes for malignant glioma patients: a report using RTOG 90-06. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Herman,et al.  Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Analysis of p53 Mutation and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Amplification in Recurrent Gliomas with Malignant Progression , 1996, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[23]  D. Nelson,et al.  Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[24]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.