DRomics, a workflow to exploit dose-response omics data in ecotoxicology

Omics technologies has opened new possibilities to assess environmental risks and to understand the mode(s) of action of pollutants. Coupled to dose-response experimental designs, they allow a non-targeted assessment of organism responses at the molecular level along an exposure gradient. However, describing the dose-response relationships on such high-throughput data is no easy task. In a first part, we review the software available for this purpose, and their main features. We set out arguments on some statistical and modeling choices we have made while developing the R package DRomics and its positioning compared to others tools. The DRomics main analysis workflow is made available through a web interface, namely a shiny app named DRomics-shiny. Next, we present the new functionalities recently implemented. DRomics has been augmented especially to be able to handle varied omics data considering the nature of the measured signal (e.g. counts of reads in RNAseq) and the way data were collected (e.g. batch effect, situation with no experimental replicates). Another important upgrade is the development of tools to ease the biological interpretation of results. Various functions are proposed to visualize, summarize and compare the responses, for different biological groups (defined from biological annotation), optionally at different experimental levels (e.g. measurements at several omics level or in different experimental conditions). A new shiny app named DRomicsInterpreter-shiny is dedicated to the biological interpretation of results. The institutional web page https://lbbe.univ-lyon1.fr/fr/dromics gathers links to all resources related to DRomics, including the two shiny applications.

[1]  E. Billoir,et al.  Effects of Chemical Compounds on the Activity of the N‐acetyl‐β‐D‐Glucosaminidase of the Marine Prawn, Palaemon serratus: Screening In Vitro , 2023, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  N. Basu,et al.  Characterizing Variability and Uncertainty Associated with Transcriptomic Dose-Response Modeling. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Kan Shao,et al.  A computational system for Bayesian benchmark dose estimation of genomic data in BBMD , 2022, Environment international.

[4]  S. Lips,et al.  Community metabolomics provides insights into mechanisms of pollution-induced community tolerance of periphyton. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Aurélie Moreira,et al.  Metabolomics insight into the influence of environmental factors in responses of freshwater biofilms to the model herbicide diuron , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[6]  I. Rodin,et al.  Untargeted and targeted analysis of sarin poisoning biomarkers in rat urine by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry , 2021, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[7]  Xiaochen Bo,et al.  clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data , 2021, Innovation.

[8]  Natalie D. Barker,et al.  Mode of action evaluation for reduced reproduction in Daphnia pulex exposed to the insensitive munition, 1-methyl-3-nitro-1-nitroguanidine (MeNQ) , 2021, Ecotoxicology.

[9]  Chenglong Ji,et al.  Global characterization of dose-dependent effects of cadmium in clam Ruditapes philippinarum. , 2021, Environmental pollution.

[10]  Othman Soufan,et al.  FastBMD: an online tool for rapid benchmark dose–response analysis of transcriptomics data , 2020, Bioinform..

[11]  T. Wubet,et al.  A multi-omics concentration-response framework uncovers novel understanding of triclosan effects in the chlorophyte Scenedesmus vacuolatus. , 2020, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  Angela Serra,et al.  BMDx: a graphical Shiny application to perform Benchmark Dose analysis for transcriptomics data , 2020, Bioinform..

[13]  M. Meier,et al.  Soil exposed to silver nanoparticles reveals significant changes in community structure and altered microbial transcriptional profiles. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[14]  S. Audebert,et al.  A systems biology approach reveals neuronal and muscle developmental defects after chronic exposure to ionising radiation in zebrafish , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[15]  S. Audebert,et al.  Differential modification of the C. elegans proteome in response to acute and chronic gamma radiation: Link with reproduction decline. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Russell S. Thomas,et al.  BMDExpress 2: enhanced transcriptomic dose-response analysis workflow , 2018, Bioinform..

[17]  Aurélie Siberchicot,et al.  DRomics: A Turnkey Tool to Support the Use of the Dose-Response Framework for Omics Data in Ecological Risk Assessment. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  Application of transcriptomic data, visualization tools and bioinformatics resources for informing mode of action , 2018, Current Opinion in Toxicology.

[19]  D. Baird,et al.  Omics Advances in Ecotoxicology. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  José Cortiñas Abrahantes,et al.  Update: use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment , 2017, EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority.

[21]  Matthew E. Ritchie,et al.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[22]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  High‐throughput concentration–response analysis for omics datasets , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[23]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[24]  P. Veber,et al.  Statistical handling of reproduction data for exposure-response modeling. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Concentration-response concept in ecotoxicoproteomics: effects of different phenanthrene concentrations to the zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryo proteome. , 2012, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[26]  Christian Ritz,et al.  Toward a unified approach to dose–response modeling in ecotoxicology , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  Bruce C Allen,et al.  BMDExpress: a software tool for the benchmark dose analyses of genomic data , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[29]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection , 2004 .

[30]  D. Moore,et al.  Estimating low toxic effects , 1997 .

[31]  J W Tukey,et al.  Testing the statistical certainty of a response to increasing doses of a drug. , 1985, Biometrics.