Distinctiveness and Expertise Effects with Homogeneous Stimuli: Towards a Model of Configural Coding

Recent studies using Brennan's computerized caricature generator have demonstrated distinctiveness effects consistent with the idea that faces are coded in terms of their individual distinctive properties. Based on these findings it is suggested that, for homogeneous classes whose members share a common configuration, distinctive configural information may be coded as metric deviations from a spatial norm. Experiments are described which demonstrate similar distinctiveness effects in bird identification. Transformations that increase distinctiveness (caricatures) produced faster identification and a higher recognition proportion, for both experts and nonexperts, than transformations that reduce distinctiveness (anticaricatures). This distinctiveness advantage is consistent with the norm-based coding idea. Furthermore, within certain limits, increasing distinctiveness did not impair performance relative to that for veridical drawings. For experts there was also a caricature advantage, such that 50% caricatures of birds in a highly homogeneous and familiar class (passerines) were identified more quickly, provided that they were recognized at all, than uncaricatured veridical drawings. The significance of a caricature advantage for the visual coding of configural information is discussed.

[1]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory , 1964 .

[2]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[3]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Read,et al.  Effects of Uniqueness, Sex of Subject, and Sex of Photograph on Facial Recognition , 1974 .

[5]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[6]  Michelle E. Cohen,et al.  Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect , 1975 .

[7]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[9]  Gordon Rae Table of A′ , 1976 .

[10]  S. Carey,et al.  Developmental changes in the representation of faces. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[12]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  S Hollander,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[14]  A. W. Ellis Normality and pathology in cognitive functions , 1982 .

[15]  H. Ellis 2 – THE ROLE OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE IN FACE PERCEPTION , 1983 .

[16]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[17]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[18]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Typicality and familiarity of faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[20]  R. Shepard Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[21]  G. Rhodes Lateralized processes in face recognition. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[22]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[23]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[24]  E. Renzi Current Issues on Prosopagnosia , 1986 .

[25]  J. Blanc-garin,et al.  Faces and Non-Faces in Prosopagnosic Patients , 1986 .

[26]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognizing familiar faces: the role of distinctiveness and familiarity. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Effects of Distinctiveness in Recognising and Classifying Faces , 1986, Perception.

[28]  John P. Frisby,et al.  Perception and Representation: A Cognitive Approach , 1986 .

[29]  Prosopagnosia: Anatomic and Physiologic Aspects , 1986 .

[30]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[33]  G. Rhodes Looking at Faces: First-Order and Second-Order Features as Determinants of Facial Appearance , 1988, Perception.

[34]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.