A coupled computational method for multi-solver, multi-domain transient problems in elastodynamics

Abstract This work presents an efficient and stable methodology for the coupling of Finite Element Methods (FEM) and Boundary Element Methods (BEM) that is independent of the particular solver and allows for independent temporal discretizations among solvers. The approach satisfies explicitly compatibility conditions and equilibrium of forces at the contact interfaces. Although the proposed approach has been developed in view of the soil–rail–vehicle dynamic interaction problem in High Speed Rail applications, it is expressed in a general form applicable to any multi-domain, multi-phase transient problem. The method development and formulations are presented in detail. Verification and application studies demonstrate the accuracy, efficiency and versatility of the method for the direct time domain solution of dynamic problems including structure–structure interaction and soil–structure interaction. The proposed approach demonstrates high accuracy and efficiency to that of direct coupling solutions and more rigorous methods.

[1]  J. B. Paiva,et al.  A mixed BEM–FEM formulation for layered soil–superstructure interaction , 2004 .

[2]  Wilson Sergio Venturini,et al.  On the coupling of 3D bem and fem frame model applied to elastodynamic analysis , 1999 .

[3]  Semih Küçükarslan.  Time domain dynamic analysis of piles under impact loading , 2002 .

[4]  Moon Kyum Kim,et al.  Three dimensional dynamic response of surface foundation on layered half-space , 2001 .

[5]  Prasanta K. Banerjee,et al.  Time‐domain transient elastodynamic analysis of 3‐D solids by BEM , 1988 .

[6]  O. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedures , 1977 .

[7]  O. Estorff,et al.  Coupled BEM/FEM approach for nonlinear soil/structure interaction , 2000 .

[8]  Eisuke Kita,et al.  Parallel computing for the combination method of BEM and FEM , 1996 .

[9]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  Investigation on the Use of Various Decoupling Approaches , 2011 .

[10]  H. Saunders,et al.  Structural Dynamics—Theory and Computations (2nd Ed.) , 1985 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[12]  Dimitrios E. Beskos,et al.  Dynamic response of 3-D flexible foundations by time domain BEM and FEM , 1985 .

[13]  Dimitris L. Karabalis,et al.  Dynamic response of 3‐D rigid surface foundations by time domain boundary element method , 1984 .

[14]  Prasanta K. Banerjee,et al.  Transient elastodynamic analysis of three‐dimensional problems by boundary element method , 1986 .

[15]  Constantine C. Spyrakos,et al.  Dynamic analysis of flexible massive strip–foundations embedded in layered soils by hybrid BEM–FEM , 2004 .

[16]  Wael Elleithy,et al.  Interface relaxation algorithms for BEM–BEM coupling and FEM–BEM coupling , 2003 .

[17]  Moon Kyum Kim,et al.  Seismic analysis of base-isolated liquid storage tanks using the BE–FE–BE coupling technique , 2002 .

[18]  D. C. Rizos,et al.  Coupled BEM–FEM solutions for direct time domain soil–structure interaction analysis , 2002 .

[19]  Dimitri E. Beskos,et al.  Boundary Element Methods in Mechanics , 1988 .

[20]  Dimitris C. Rizos,et al.  An advanced direct time domain BEM for 3-D wave propagation in acoustic media , 2006 .

[21]  D. C. Rizos,et al.  Dynamic and Seismic Analysis of Foundations based on Free Field B-Spline Characteristic Response Histories , 2002 .

[22]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  A Dual Approach to Substructure Decoupling Techniques , 2011 .

[23]  Wael Elleithy,et al.  Iterative coupling of BE and FE methods in elastostatics , 2001 .

[24]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[25]  Wael Elleithy,et al.  Convergence of the domain decomposition finite element–boundary element coupling methods , 2002 .

[26]  D. C. Rizos,et al.  A 3D BEM-FEM methodology for simulation of high speed train induced vibrations , 2005 .

[27]  Carlos Alberto Brebbia,et al.  Combination of boundary and finite elements in elastostatics , 1979 .

[28]  W. S. Venturini,et al.  Further improvements on three dimensional transient BEM elastodynamic analysis , 1996 .

[29]  Nasser Khalili,et al.  Dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis via coupled finite-element–boundary-element method , 1999 .

[30]  Constantine C. Spyrakos,et al.  Seismic soil-structure interaction of massive flexible strip-foundations embedded in layered soils by hybrid BEM-FEM , 2003 .

[31]  Dimitris L. Karabalis,et al.  An advanced direct time domain BEM formulation for general 3-D elastodynamic problems , 1994 .

[32]  R. Eatock Taylor,et al.  The coupled finite element and boundary element analysis of nonlinear interactions between waves and bodies , 2003 .

[33]  Dimitris L. Karabalis,et al.  A time domain BEM for 3-D elastodynamic analysis using the B-spline fundamental solutions , 1998 .

[34]  Eisuke Kita,et al.  Parallel implementation of boundary element method with domain decomposition , 1996 .

[35]  A. V. Mendonca,et al.  An elastostatic FEM/BEM analysis of vertically loaded raft and piled raft foundation , 2003 .

[36]  Daniel Rixen,et al.  Substructuring using Impulse Response Functions for Impact Analysis , 2011 .

[37]  W. S. Venturini,et al.  A simple comparison between two 3D time domain elastodynamic boundary element formulations , 1996 .

[38]  Marc Bonnet,et al.  Fast multipole method applied to elastostatic BEM-FEM coupling , 2005 .

[39]  Otto von Estorff,et al.  Iterative coupling of FEM and BEM in 3D transient elastodynamics , 2005 .

[40]  D. C. Rizos.  A rigid surface boundary element for soil-structure interaction analysis in the direct time domain , 2000 .

[41]  D. C. Rizos,et al.  B-Spline impulse response functions (BIRF) for transient SSI analysis of rigid foundations , 2006 .