Productivity and growth : the relevance of the national system of entrepreneurship

In this study we evaluate how country-level entrepreneurship—measured via the national system of entrepreneurship—impacts total factor productivity, and how the national system of entrepreneurship triggers productivity by increasing the beneficial effects of different types of entrepreneurship, namely Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Using a comprehensive database for 73 countries during 2002-2013, we employ a non-parametric technique—Data Envelopment Analysis—to build the world technology frontier and compute the Malmquist total factor productivity index and its components. The results are consistent with the notion that the national system of entrepreneurship is positively associated with total factor productivity at the country level. Additionally, the findings reveal that the national system of entrepreneurship enhances efficiency change via enhanced Kirznerian entrepreneurship in the short-run, while the positive effect on total factor productivity of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship prevails in the long run. The results suggest that public policies promoting Kirznerian entrepreneurship—e.g., increased business formation rates—may be conducive to productivity in periods of economic growth. In contrast, policy interventions targeting Schumpeterian entrepreneurship objectives—e.g., innovative entrepreneurship and the development of new technologies—yield to technical progress and, consequently, productivity growth, regardless of the state of the economic cycle (growth of stagnation).

[1]  J. Hicks,et al.  Value and Capital , 2017 .

[2]  Z. Ács,et al.  Country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2016 .

[3]  Z. Acs High-impact firms: gazelles revisited , 2015 .

[4]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  Productivity Accounting: The Economics of Business Performance , 2015 .

[5]  R. Thurik Entrepreneurship and the business cycle , 2014 .

[6]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  E. Autio,et al.  National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications , 2013 .

[8]  A. Stel,et al.  The more business owners, the merrier? The role of tertiary education , 2013 .

[9]  J. Prieger,et al.  Economic Growth and the Optimal Level of Entrepreneurship , 2013 .

[10]  S. Terjesen,et al.  Coase on entrepreneurship , 2013 .

[11]  Ilke Van Beveren,et al.  TOTAL FACTOR PRODUCTIVITY ESTIMATION: A PRACTICAL REVIEW , 2012 .

[12]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application , 2011 .

[13]  Pontus Braunerhjelm,et al.  The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth , 2010 .

[14]  R. Thurik,et al.  Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[15]  R. Sobel Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[16]  Mirjam van Praag,et al.  What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth and Convergence in the European Union , 2006 .

[18]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Stochastic Approaches to Data Envelopment Analysis , 2004 .

[19]  C. Lovell,et al.  The Decomposition of Malmquist Productivity Indexes , 2003 .

[20]  W. Briec,et al.  Luenberger and Malmquist Productivity Indices: Theoretical Comparisons and Empirical Illustration , 2003 .

[21]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .

[22]  P. Howitt,et al.  Endogenous Growth Theory , 1999 .

[23]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Why Do Some Countries Produce so Much More Output Per Worker than Others? , 1998 .

[24]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  A DEA-based analysis of productivity change and intertemporal managerial performance , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[25]  Danny Quah,et al.  Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs , 1997 .

[26]  Alwyn Young,et al.  Growth without Scale Effects , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  R. Barro,et al.  Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth , 1995 .

[28]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[29]  Stephen L. Parente,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[31]  A. Kleinknecht Are There Schumpeterian Waves of Innovations , 1990 .

[32]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[33]  Gerhard Mensch,et al.  Stalemate in Technology: Innovations Overcome the Depression , 1978 .

[34]  Israel M. Kirzner,et al.  Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1974 .

[35]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[36]  S. Malmquist Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[37]  J. Schumpeter The Creative Response in Economic History , 1947, The Journal of Economic History.

[38]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Capital and the Theory of Productivity Measurement , 2016 .

[39]  Zoltan J. Acs,et al.  2008 Executive Report , 2009 .

[40]  Costas Azariadis,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth , 2007 .

[41]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Malmquist Productivity Indexes: A Survey of Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[42]  Israel M. Kirzner Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach , 1997 .

[43]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[44]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[45]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[46]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[47]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Long Waves and Technological Innovation , 1983 .

[48]  P. Samuelson,et al.  In-variant Economic Index Numbers and Canoni-cal Duality: Survey and Synthesis , 1973 .

[49]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[50]  Aart Kraay,et al.  The World Technology Frontier , 2022 .

[51]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change Endogenous Technological Change , 2022 .