Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy

The consensus algorithm for the management of type 2 diabetes was developed on behalf of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes approximately 1 year ago (1,2). This evidence-based algorithm was developed to help guide health care providers to choose the most appropriate treatment regimens from an ever-expanding list of approved medications. The authors continue to endorse the major features of the algorithm, including the need to achieve and maintain glycemia within or as close to the nondiabetic range as is safely possible, the initiation of lifestyle interventions and treatment with metformin at the time of diagnosis, the rapid addition of medications and transition to new regimens when target glycemia is not achieved, and the early addition of insulin therapy in patients who do not meet target A1C levels. The availability of newly approved medications and the accrual of new clinical trial and other data should inform the algorithm. In this update, we primarily address one important issue that has received much recent attention: our current understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of the thiazolidinediones. In addition, we have revised the original Table 1 to include the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin, which was not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration at the time of our original publication (Table 1). We are mindful of the importance of not changing this consensus guideline in …

[1]  B. Zinman,et al.  Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[2]  L. Kennedy Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes—An Interim Analysis , 2008 .

[3]  R. Nesto,et al.  Congestive heart failure and cardiovascular death in patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes given thiazolidinediones: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials , 2007, The Lancet.

[4]  Yoon K Loke,et al.  Long-term risk of cardiovascular events with rosiglitazone: a meta-analysis. , 2007, JAMA.

[5]  A. Lincoff,et al.  Pioglitazone and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2007, JAMA.

[6]  N. Marchionni,et al.  Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular risk. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Hanefeld,et al.  Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes--an interim analysis. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  J. Drazen,et al.  Rosiglitazone--continued uncertainty about safety. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Bruce M Psaty,et al.  The record on rosiglitazone and the risk of myocardial infarction. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Nathan Rosiglitazone and cardiotoxicity--weighing the evidence. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Nissen,et al.  Effect of rosiglitazone on the risk of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  P. Cryer Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of Therapy: A Consensus Statement From the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes , 2007, Diabetes Care.

[13]  B. Zinman,et al.  Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  S. Cummings,et al.  Thiazolidinedione use and bone loss in older diabetic adults. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[15]  R. Heine,et al.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy , 2006, Diabetologia.