Development paths towards open government - an empirical analysis among heritage institutions

Abstract In the face of the growing digitization of society, a series of transformations are taking place in the public sector that have been described as the second generation of e-government development. The present article traces how these transformations have been anticipated by successive generations of e-government maturity models and critically assesses existing stage models. Based on a survey among 1560 heritage institutions in 11 countries, an empirically validated maturity model for the implementation of open government is presented. The model uses innovation diffusion theory as a theoretical backdrop. While the model is at odds with the unidimensional nature of the Lee & Kwak Open Government Maturity Model (Lee & Kwak, 2012), the findings suggest that the transformative processes predicted by various e-government maturity models are well at work. They result in increasingly integrated services, participative approaches and an emerging collaborative culture, accompanied by a break-up of proprietary data silos and their replacement by a commonly shared data infrastructure, allowing data to be freely shared, inter-linked and re-used. In order to put our findings into perspective, we take stock of earlier discussions and criticisms of e-government maturity models and offer a new take on the issue of stages-of-growth models in the field of e-government. The proposed approach rests on the assumption of an evolutionary model that is empirically grounded and allows for varying development paths.

[1]  Dong-Young Kim,et al.  E-government maturity model using the capability maturity model integration , 2010, J. Syst. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Gene Loh Linked data and IIIF: Integrating taxonomy management with image annotation , 2017, 2017 Pacific Neighborhood Consortium Annual Conference and Joint Meetings (PNC).

[3]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons , 2007 .

[4]  D. Norris,et al.  Local E‐Government in the United States: Transformation or Incremental Change? , 2013 .

[5]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  e-Government 2015: exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Wolfgang G. Stock,et al.  Government and Social Media: A Case Study of 31 Informational World Cities , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Becky Yoose,et al.  The Linked Open Data Landscape in Libraries and Beyond , 2013 .

[10]  Stephen P. Osborne,et al.  Handbook of Innovation in Public Services , 2013 .

[11]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  K. A. Shahkooh,et al.  A Proposed Model for E-government Maturity , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications.

[13]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Measurement and benchmarking foundations: Providing support to organizations in their development and growth using dashboards , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[15]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  E-Government Portals in Mexico , 2006 .

[16]  Peter Johnson,et al.  The Economics of Museums: A Research Perspective , 1998 .

[17]  Efthimios Tambouris,et al.  Open Government Data: A Stage Model , 2011, EGOV.

[18]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Social media in Egyptian government websites: Presence, usage, and effectiveness , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  David C. Hammack Private Organizations, Public Purposes: Nonprofits and Their Archives , 1989 .

[21]  Yuan Long,et al.  Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[22]  R. Zwicker,et al.  Barriers for transformation: Impediments for transforming the public sector through e-government , 2009 .

[23]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[24]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  The forgotten promise of e-government maturity: Assessing responsiveness in the digital public sector , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara,et al.  Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition , 2012, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[27]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage domain: opportunities and challenges , 2011, C&T.

[28]  Max Evans,et al.  Archives of the People, by the People, for the People , 2008 .

[29]  Kirsty Strokosch Co-production and innovation in public services: can co-production drive innovation? , 2013 .

[30]  Clay G. Wescott,et al.  E‐Government in the Asia‐pacific region , 2001 .

[31]  Beat Estermann,et al.  Conceptualizing a national data infrastructure for Switzerland , 2018, Inf. Polity.

[32]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[33]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[35]  Lori A. Brainard,et al.  Virtual Government–Citizen Relations , 2010 .

[36]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Governing in the Information Age , 1998 .

[37]  P. Capriotti,et al.  Assessing dialogic communication through the Internet in Spanish museums , 2012 .

[38]  Frank Bannister,et al.  E-government Stage Models: A Contextual Critique , 2015, 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[39]  Gerald Grant,et al.  Developing a Generic Framework for E-Government , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[41]  Y. Benkler 'Sharing Nicely': On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production , 2004 .

[42]  C. Hood A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[43]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Christine Mingins,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Model for E-Government Development with Cases in China's Regional E-Government Practice and Experience , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government.

[45]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Beat Estermann,et al.  Diffusion of Open Data and Crowdsourcing among Heritage Institutions: Results of a Pilot Survey in Switzerland , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[47]  Han Woo Park,et al.  Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[48]  J. Schuster,et al.  Neither Public Nor Private: The Hybridization of Museums , 1998 .

[49]  B. Estermann OPENGLAM BENCHMARK SURVEY – MEASURING THE ADVANCEMENT OF OPEN DATA / OPEN CONTENT IN THE HERITAGE SECTOR , 2017 .

[50]  I. Netchaeva,et al.  E-Government and E-Democracy , 2002 .

[51]  Hernán Astudillo,et al.  E-Government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  From government to e-government: a transition model , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[53]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  Leonid Stoimenov,et al.  Benchmarking open government: An open data perspective , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Laura Cagnazzo Linked Data: Implementation, Use, and Perceptions across European National Libraries. , 2017 .

[56]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[57]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[58]  C. Hood,et al.  From old public administration to new public management , 1994 .

[59]  Rose Holley,et al.  Crowdsourcing: How and Why Should Libraries Do It? , 2010, D Lib Mag..

[60]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Realizing joined-up government - Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[61]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[62]  Abdoullah Fath-Allah and Laila Cheikhi and Rafa E. Al-Qutais Idri,et al.  e-Government maturity models: a comparative study , 2014 .

[63]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[64]  S. Putri United Nations E-government Survey 2014 Report , 2015 .

[65]  Chern Li Shannon Gillian Reid Liew,et al.  Social Media in Libraries and Archives: Applied with Caution/Les médias sociaux dans les bibliothèques et les archives : Appliqués avec prudence , 2015 .

[66]  Sigurd Trolle Gronemann,et al.  Mediated co-construction of museums and audiences on Facebook , 2015 .

[67]  Noreen Whysel,et al.  Linked open data for cultural heritage: evolution of an information technology , 2013, SIGDOC '13.

[68]  Helmut Leopold,et al.  Social Media , 2012, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[69]  Laura C. Hand,et al.  "You Have One Friend Request" , 2011 .

[70]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government , 2007, Inf. Soc..

[71]  C. Hood The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[72]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Justification by Works or by Faith? , 1995 .

[73]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  10 year retrospect on stage models of e-Government: A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[74]  Reinhard Riedl,et al.  "Integrated" and "transcendent" e-government: keys for analyzing organizational structure and governance , 2009, D.GO.

[75]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[76]  Vicente Pina,et al.  E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries: Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? , 2005, Online Inf. Rev..

[77]  Chern Li Liew,et al.  Participatory Cultural Heritage: A Tale of Two Institutions' Use of Social Media , 2014, D Lib Mag..

[78]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  Ten Years of E-Government: The 'End of History' and New Beginning , 2010, EGOV.

[79]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .