Type-2 neutrosophic number based multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) approach for offshore wind farm site selection in USA

[1]  Jianming Zhan,et al.  Covering-based variable precision fuzzy rough sets with PROMETHEE-EDAS methods , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  An outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems with interval-valued neutrosophic sets , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[3]  Jianping Yuan,et al.  Study of decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection based on ELECTRE-III under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case of China , 2016 .

[4]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MABAC approach for material selection with incomplete weight information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[5]  Operation and Maintenance Map of the U.S. Offshore Wind Farms , 2017 .

[6]  Wende Zhang,et al.  Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on trapezoidal fuzzy neutrosophic numbers , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Yuanyuan Liu,et al.  An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy rough numbers , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Nada A. Nabeeh,et al.  A Novel Methodology for Assessment of Hospital Service according to BWM, MABAC, PROMETHEE II , 2020 .

[9]  R. John,et al.  Offshore Wind Farms: A Fuzzy Approach to Site Selection in a Black Sea Region , 2020, 2020 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC).

[10]  Surapati Pramanik,et al.  Cosine Similarity Measure Based Multi-attribute Decision-making with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers , 2015 .

[11]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Extension of weighted aggregated sum product assessment with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (WASPAS-IVIF) , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[12]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Selecting an outsourcing provider based on the combined MABAC-ELECTRE method using single-valued neutrosophic linguistic sets , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  A Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Projection-Based MABAC Method for Patients’ Prioritization , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[14]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location , 2010 .

[15]  M. Anand,et al.  Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Numbers with WASPAS , 2018, Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets.

[16]  M. S. García-Cascales,et al.  GIS-based onshore wind farm site selection using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods. Evaluating the case of Southeastern Spain , 2016 .

[17]  Ilgin Gokasar,et al.  WASPAS and TOPSIS based interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method for a selection of a car sharing station , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[18]  Gökhan Özçelik,et al.  Interval-Valued Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy CODAS Method for Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Problems , 2018, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[19]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making , 2010 .

[20]  Nuh Erdogan,et al.  Impact of Electrical Topology, Capacity Factor and Line Length on Economic Performance of Offshore Wind Investments , 2019, Energies.

[21]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Interval-valued Fuzzy Soft Decision Making Methods Based on MABAC, Similarity Measure and EDAS , 2017, Fundam. Informaticae.

[22]  Selman Karagoz,et al.  A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul , 2020, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[23]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  An integrated model for extending brand based on fuzzy ARAS and ANP methods , 2014 .

[24]  Jianming Zhan,et al.  TOPSIS-WAA method based on a covering-based fuzzy rough set: An application to rating problem , 2020, Inf. Sci..

[25]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[26]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  Hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection using intuitionistic fuzzy sets based WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[27]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making problems ith simplified neutrosophic sets uan - , 2014 .

[28]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  An extension of ARAS methodology under Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy environment for Digital Supply Chain , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[29]  Bri-Mathias Hodge,et al.  The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit , 2015 .

[30]  Meng Yang,et al.  An innovative method for offshore wind farm site selection based on the interval number with probability distribution , 2017 .

[31]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2016 .

[32]  Temitope Raphael Ayodele,et al.  A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: The case study of Nigeria , 2018, Applied Energy.

[33]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Assessment of consumers' motivations to purchase a remanufactured product by applying Fuzzy Delphi method and single valued neutrosophic sets , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[34]  Rıdvan Şahin,et al.  Decision making with MABAC method under probabilistic single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy environment , 2020, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[35]  Yiyu Yao,et al.  Three-Way Multiattribute Decision-Making Based on Outranking Relations , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[36]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  A multi-valued neutrosophic qualitative flexible approach based on likelihood for multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2017, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[37]  Muhammet Deveci,et al.  Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland , 2020 .

[38]  Nuh Erdogan,et al.  Exploring the offshore wind energy potential of Turkey based on multi-criteria site selection , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[39]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment , 2012 .

[40]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An extension of the ELECTRE approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[41]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals , 2018, Soft Comput..

[42]  W. Short,et al.  A manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies , 1995 .

[43]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[44]  Yunna Wu,et al.  A decision framework of offshore wind power station site selection using a PROMETHEE method under intuitionistic fuzzy environment: A case in China , 2020, Ocean & Coastal Management.

[45]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Evaluation of e-commerce websites: An integrated approach under a single-valued trapezoidal neutrosophic environment , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[46]  Xindong Peng,et al.  Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[47]  Duško Tešić,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making Model with Z-Numbers Based on FUCOM and MABAC model , 2020, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[48]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[49]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  A projection-based TODIM method under multi-valued neutrosophic environments and its application in personnel selection , 2016, Neural Computing and Applications.

[50]  Hao Wu,et al.  Risk assessment of rockburst via an extended MABAC method under fuzzy environment , 2019, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology.

[51]  Abdolvahhab Fetanat,et al.  A novel hybrid MCDM approach for offshore wind farm site selection: A case study of Iran , 2015 .

[52]  Surapati Pramanik,et al.  Aggregation of Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Set Information and Its Application to Multi-Attribute Decision Making , 2016 .

[53]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Frank Choquet Bonferroni Mean Operators of Bipolar Neutrosophic Sets and Their Application to Multi-criteria Decision-Making Problems , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[54]  Faruk Karaaslan,et al.  Type-2 single-valued neutrosophic sets and their applications in multi-criteria group decision making based on TOPSIS method , 2020, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[55]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[56]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  Extended MABAC method based on divergence measures for multi-criteria assessment of programming language with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2018, Granular Computing.

[57]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy WASPAS Method: Application in Reservoir Flood Control Management Policy , 2018, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[58]  Nuh Erdogan,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of high potential offshore wind farm locations in Turkey , 2018, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[59]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[60]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Location selection of offshore wind power station by consensus decision framework using picture fuzzy modelling , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[61]  Maria Dicorato,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of investment cost for offshore wind generation , 2011 .

[62]  Ivan Petrovic,et al.  Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[63]  Harish Garg,et al.  Algorithms for interval-valued fuzzy soft sets in emergency decision making based on WDBA and CODAS with new information measure , 2018, Computers & Industrial Engineering.

[64]  Mehdi Keshavarz Ghorabaee,et al.  A NEW COMBINATIVE DISTANCE-BASED ASSESSMENT(CODAS) METHOD FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING , 2016 .

[65]  Mohamed Abdel-Basset,et al.  An approach of TOPSIS technique for developing supplier selection with group decision making under type-2 neutrosophic number , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[66]  Zdzis?aw Pawlak,et al.  Rough sets , 2005, International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences.

[67]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  An extended MABAC method for multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on correlative inputs of intuitionistic fuzzy information , 2019, Comput. Appl. Math..

[68]  Jian-qiang Wang,et al.  An Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Likelihood-Based MABAC Approach and Its Application in Selecting Hotels on a Tourism Website , 2017, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[69]  S Pamucar Dragan,et al.  Use of the fuzzy AHP-MABAC hybrid model in ranking potential locations for preparing laying-up positions , 2016 .

[70]  Arunodaya Raj Mishra,et al.  A novel WASPAS approach for multi-criteria physician selection problem with intuitionistic fuzzy type-2 sets , 2020, Soft Comput..

[71]  Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[72]  Yang Wang,et al.  A fuzzy-MADM based approach for site selection of offshore wind farm in busy waterways in China , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[73]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: A case study of Vojvodina, Serbia , 2017 .

[74]  Peide Liu,et al.  An Extension of ARAS Methodology for Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making Problems within Probability Multi-valued Neutrosophic Sets , 2019, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.