Effective segmentation method of target based on polarization-modulated 3D imaging system

To implement Real-time segmentation for polarization-modulated 3D imaging system, an efficient segmentation method for multi-dimensional information fusion is proposed in this paper. Conventional 3D imaging Lidar systems use an avalanche photodiode (APD) array detector to measure time-of-flight of each pixel in the scene. Here we propose and experimentally demonstrate a super-resolution 3D imaging framework based on a new imaging sensor EMCCD (Electron Multiplying Charge Coupled Device). Due to its low bandwidth characteristics, the electro-optic modulators are applied to implement temporal (range) resolution, and meanwhile act as a fast shutter with sub-nanosecond-level. Consequently, rangegated 3D imaging can be achieved to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance in our framework. With dual EMCCDs structure, the depth map and intensity image can be reconstructed from adding the two modulated images. The iterative threshold algorithm method is applied to the target segmentation of high-resolution images, and image morphological erosion algorithm are used to improve the segmentation accuracy. The target’s pixel coordinate position obtained by image segmentation is mapped to 3D point cloud data to get the segmented target point cloud data. Experimental results show that the system can achieve high-precision flash imaging. Meanwhile, the segmentation method has a great improvement in time efficiency compared with traditional clustering algorithm, and can reduce the under-segmentation error rate. Ultimately, we found that the imaging method showed outstanding performance on highprecision imaging with an error less than 0.1m in a wide field-of-view of 0.9mrad. And the segmentation of target takes only 560ms.

[1]  David Dussault,et al.  Noise performance comparison of ICCD with CCD and EMCCD cameras , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[2]  Theresa A. Maldonado Electro‐optic Devices , 2007 .

[3]  Vivek K Goyal,et al.  Photon-efficient imaging with a single-photon camera , 2016, Nature Communications.

[4]  R. Raskar,et al.  Single-photon sensitive light-in-fight imaging , 2015, Nature Communications.

[5]  Zhang Xiuda,et al.  Pulse-shape-free method for long-range three-dimensional active imaging with high linear accuracy. , 2008, Optics letters.

[6]  Vivek K Goyal,et al.  First-Photon Imaging , 2014, Science.

[7]  B. Hadwen,et al.  The noise performance of electron multiplying charge-coupled devices , 2003 .

[8]  Justin J. Baker,et al.  Digital-Pixel Focal Plane Array Technology , 2015 .

[9]  Martin Laurenzis,et al.  Long-range three-dimensional active imaging with superresolution depth mapping. , 2007, Optics letters.

[10]  Daniel R. Schuette,et al.  Large-Format Geiger-Mode Avalanche Photodiode Arrays and Readout Circuits , 2018, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[11]  Vivek K. Goyal,et al.  Photon-Efficient Computational 3-D and Reflectivity Imaging With Single-Photon Detectors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[12]  J. L. Forand,et al.  Range-gated underwater laser imaging system , 1993 .

[13]  Young-Jin Kim,et al.  Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses , 2010 .

[14]  Wenwen Zhang,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio performance comparison of Electron Multiplying CCD and Intensified CCD detectors , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing.

[15]  René Doyon,et al.  Electron-multiplying CCDs for future space instruments , 2013, Other Conferences.

[16]  Donal J. Denvir,et al.  Electron multiplying CCD technology: The new ICCD , 2003 .

[17]  Paul F. McManamon,et al.  Review of ladar: a historic, yet emerging, sensor technology with rich phenomenology , 2012 .

[18]  Brent Schwarz,et al.  LIDAR: Mapping the world in 3D , 2010 .

[19]  Qin Zhou,et al.  Overcoming the shot-noise limitation of three-dimensional active imaging. , 2011, Optics letters.