On the added value of multiset methods for three-way data analysis☆
暂无分享,去创建一个
Iven Van Mechelen | Eva Ceulemans | Marieke E. Timmerman | Kim De Roover | I. Mechelen | E. Ceulemans | M. Timmerman | K. Roover
[1] Eva Ceulemans,et al. CHull as an alternative to AIC and BIC in the context of mixtures of factor analyzers , 2013, Behavior research methods.
[2] Iven Van Mechelen,et al. Comparability problems in the analysis of multiway data , 2011 .
[3] Claus A. Andersson,et al. PARAFAC2—Part II. Modeling chromatographic data with retention time shifts , 1999 .
[4] H. Kiers,et al. Three-mode principal components analysis: choosing the numbers of components and sensitivity to local optima. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[5] Eva Ceulemans,et al. A clusterwise simultaneous component method for capturing within-cluster differences in component variances and correlations. , 2013, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[6] L. Tucker. A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .
[7] J. Berge,et al. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. , 2006 .
[8] Richard A. Harshman,et al. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-model factor analysis , 1970 .
[9] P. Kroonenberg. Applied Multiway Data Analysis , 2008 .
[10] Eva Ceulemans,et al. How to perform multiblock component analysis in practice , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.
[11] Rasmus Bro,et al. The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB , 2000 .
[12] Marieke E. Timmerman,et al. Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences , 2003 .
[13] Eva Ceulemans,et al. Modeling Differences in the Dimensionality of Multiblock Data by Means of Clusterwise Simultaneous Component Analysis , 2013, Psychometrika.
[14] Eva Ceulemans,et al. CHull: A generic convex-hull-based model selection method , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.
[15] Rasmus Bro,et al. Multi‐way models for sensory profiling data , 2008 .
[16] R. A. Harshman,et al. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model , 1984 .
[17] Marieke E Timmerman,et al. Multilevel component analysis. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[18] L. Tucker,et al. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.
[19] J. Chang,et al. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .
[20] F. L. Hitchcock. The Expression of a Tensor or a Polyadic as a Sum of Products , 1927 .
[21] H. Kiers,et al. Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three-mode principal component analysis. , 2009, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[22] H. Kiers,et al. Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: a numerical convex hull based method. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[23] R. A. van den Berg,et al. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data , 2006, BMC Genomics.
[24] R. Bro,et al. Centering and scaling in component analysis , 2003 .
[25] Eva Ceulemans,et al. The CHull procedure for selecting among multilevel component solutions , 2011 .
[26] A. Stegeman. On uniqueness conditions for Candecomp/Parafac and Indscal with full column rank in one mode , 2009 .
[27] R. Bro,et al. A new efficient method for determining the number of components in PARAFAC models , 2003 .
[28] Eva Ceulemans,et al. Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data. , 2012, Psychological methods.