The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of acidified whole milk fed at 10 % of body weight on calf performance, and the incidence of scours. Twenty Holstein calves were assigned to one of two dietary treatments (whole milk or acidified whole milk), each consisting of 10 calves (5 male and 5 female), from d 5 to d 46 of age for a 42-d trial. Calves were fed either warm whole milk (35 to 37 0C) or acidified cold whole milk (acidified with formic acid to pH 4.8 and given at 10 to 20 0C) from nipple pails twice daily at 10 % of body weight. The amounts of milk given were adjusted weekly according to body weight, and the calves were gradually weaned, starting at d 40 of age. During the experiment, the calves were offered pelleted starter, alfalfa hay and water for ad libitum intake. All the calves were housed in individual pens. Body weight was recorded weekly. Fecal consistency scores were recorded daily on a scale of 1 to 4 (1=normal, 2=soft, 3=runny and 4=watery). Intakes of whole milk, starter, and total dry matter from milk and starter were similar between the treatments. Average daily body weight gains (d 5 to 46) for calves fed whole milk, and acidified whole milk were also similar (427.44 and 459.95 g/d, respectively). There was no significant difference in the efficiency of feed conversion between the treatments. Calves fed acidified whole milk exhibited lower fecal consistency scores than did calves fed whole milk (2.04 vs. 2.33 during d 5 to 25 and 1.34 vs. 1.46 during d 26 to 46) even though the differences between treatments were not significant. The percentage of calf days with scours was significantly higher for calves fed whole milk than for those fed acidified whole milk for d 5 through 25 (34.28 vs. 18.57 %). In the same period, the percentage of calf days treated for scours was 8.57 % for calves fed whole milk while there was no incidence of scours requiring treatment in calves fed acidified whole milk. The cost of body weight gain was quite high for calves fed whole milk compared with those fed acidified whole milk, due mainly to the costs of veterinary treatment for scours ( 3.76 vs. 2.68 / kg gain).
[1]
G. Mccoy,et al.
Feeding acidified or sweet milk replacer to dairy calves.
,
1990,
Journal of dairy science.
[2]
M. Murphy,et al.
Diet digestibility and growth of holstein calves fed acidified milk replacers containing soy protein concentrate.
,
1989,
Journal of dairy science.
[3]
L. D. Muller,et al.
Ad Libitum or Twice Daily Feeding of Acidified Milk Replacer to Calves Housed Individually in Warm and Cold Environments
,
1988
.
[4]
M. Murphy,et al.
Abomasal pH, nutrient digestibility, and growth of Holstein bull calves fed acidified milk replacer.
,
1987,
Journal of dairy science.
[5]
J. Nocek,et al.
Performance, health, and postweaning growth on calves fed cold, acidified milk replacer ad libitum.
,
1986,
Journal of dairy science.
[6]
J. Webster,et al.
Calf Husbandry, Health and Welfare
,
1984
.
[7]
M. Lindeman,et al.
A note on the performance and management of calves reared on cold acidified milk replacer fed ad libitum
,
1983
.
[8]
R. Cooper,et al.
Effect of high acid milk replacer in conjunction with hay and concentrates on the faecal coliform population of preweaned calves
,
1982,
Veterinary Record.
[9]
G. Simm,et al.
The effect of acid milk replacer on faecal coliform populations in preweaned calves
,
1980,
Veterinary Record.
[10]
L. D. Muller,et al.
Guidelines toward more uniformity in measuring and reporting calf experimental data.
,
1977
.