Regulatory functions of hapten-reactive helper and suppressor T lymphocytes. I. Detection and characterization of hapten-reactive suppressor T-cell activity in mice immunized with hapten-isologous protein conjugate

Helper and suppressor T-cell activities were detected simultaneously in the spleen cells of mice immunized with para-azobenzoate (PAB)-mouse gammaglobulin (MGG). Dinitrophenyl (DNP)-specific B cells were raised by immunization with DNP-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and used as the indicator B-cell population. The helper and suppressor T-cell activities were determined after adoptively transferring spleen cells from PAB-MGG- primed donors and DNP-KLH-primed donors into X-irradiated recipients. Stimulation of these recipients with DNP-MGG-PAB detected helper T-cell activity, which was measured in terms of increased anti-DNP antibody responses of DNP-KLH-primed cells over these responses in the presence of unprimed cells. On the other hand, when DNP-KLH-primed cells were stimulated with DNP-KLH-PAB in the presence of PAB-MGG-primed cells, anti-DNP antibody responses were substantially lower than in unprimed normal cells. This suppressor cell population was (a) hapten-reactive, (b) present in B-cell-depleted spleen cells, (c) Thy-1 positive, (d) detectable earlier than the helper T-cell activities after priming (e) more radiosensitive than helper cells, and (f) found in the spleen but not the lymph nodes in contrast to helper T cells. These data indicate that these suppressor T cells are distinct from the helper T cells. PAB-reactive T cells clearly suppressed the antibody response by inhibiting KLH-reactive helper T-cell functions. The hapten-reactive T-lymphocyte system described here should be useful for analyzing and manipulating the immune response and for studying regulatory interactions of helper and suppressor T cells in the induction of antibody responses.

[1]  H. Yamamoto,et al.  Regulatory functions of hapten-reactive helper and suppressor T lymphocytes. II. Selective inactivation of hapten-reactive suppressor T cells by hapten-nonimmunogenic copolymers of D-amino acids, and its application to the study of suppressor T-cell effect on helper T-cell development , 1977, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  S. Kojima,et al.  Suppression of IgE antibody production in SJL mice. II. Expression of Ly-1 antigen on helper and nonspecific suppressor T cells. , 1977, Journal of immunology.

[3]  K. Rajewsky,et al.  Specific enrichment of antigen‐binding receptors from sensitized murine lymphocytes , 1976, European journal of immunology.

[4]  K. Takatsu,et al.  Selective suppression of t‐cell activity in tumor‐bearing mice and its improvement by lentinan, a potent anti‐tumor polysaccharide , 1976, International journal of cancer.

[5]  O. Devinsky,et al.  Cell-mediated immunity: delayed-type hypersensitivity and cytotoxic responses are mediated by different T-cell subclasses , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[6]  H. Cantor,et al.  Separation of helper T cells from suppressor T cells expressing different Ly components. II. Activation by antigen: after immunization, antigen-specific suppressor and helper activities are mediated by distinct T-cell subclasses , 1976, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[7]  L. Herzenberg,et al.  Further studies on Th-B, a cell surface antigenic determinant present on mouse B cells, plasma cells and immature thymocytes. , 1976, Cellular immunology.

[8]  M. Feldmann,et al.  Suppressor cell induction in vitro. II. Cellular requirements of suppressor cell induction , 1976, European journal of immunology.

[9]  T. Hamaoka,et al.  Immune maturation of T lymphocytes: sequential changes in the functional specificity and apparent affinity of hapten-reactive helper T cells during an immune response. , 1976, Cellular immunology.

[10]  M. Greene,et al.  Regualtion of the immune response to tumor antigens. I. Immunosuppressor cells in tumor-bearing hosts. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[11]  R. Hodes,et al.  In vitro generation of suppressor cell activity: suppression of in vitro induction if cell-mediated cytotoxicity. , 1976, Journal of immunology.

[12]  A Basten,et al.  T Cell‐Dependent Suppression of an Anti‐Hapten Antibody Response , 1975, Transplantation reviews.

[13]  K. Eichmann Idiotype suppression. II. Amplification of a suppressor T cell with anti‐idiotypic activity , 1975, European journal of immunology.

[14]  T. Hamaoka,et al.  The mechanism of tolerance induction in thymus-derived lymphocytes; I. intracellular inactivation of hapten-reactive helper T lymphocytes by hapten-nonimmunogenic copolymer of D-amino acids , 1975, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[15]  I. Cohen,et al.  Enhancing T lymphocytes from tumor‐bearing mice suppress host resistance to a syngeneic tumor , 1974, European journal of immunology.

[16]  M. Feldmann T cell suppression in vitro. I. Role in regulation of antibody responses , 1974, European journal of immunology.

[17]  C. Elson,et al.  The suppressive effect of carrier priming on the response to a hapten‐carrier conjugate , 1974, European journal of immunology.

[18]  H. Claman,et al.  Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. 3. Transfer of tolerance with "suppressor T cells". , 1974, Journal of immunology.

[19]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  GENETIC CONTROL OF IMMUNE RESPONSES IN VITRO V. STIMULATION OF SUPPRESSOR T CELLS IN NONRESPONDER MICE BY THE TERPOLYMER L-GLUTAMIC ACID60-L-ALANINE30-L-TYROSINE10 (GAT) , 1974 .

[20]  T. Takemori,et al.  SELECTIVE ROLES OF THYMUS-DERIVED LYMPHOCYTES IN THE ANTIBODY RESPONSE , 1974, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  J. Sprent,et al.  CELL-TO-CELL INTERACTION IN THE IMMUNE RESPONSE , 1974, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[22]  G. Asherson,et al.  Depression of the T Cell Phenomenon of Contact Sensitivity by T Cells from Unresponsive Mice , 1973, Nature.

[23]  R. Riblet,et al.  ACTIVE SUPPRESSION OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN ALLOTYPE SYNTHESIS III. IDENTITICATION OF T CELLS AS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPRESSION BY CELLS FROM SPLEEN, THYMUS, LYMPH NODE, AND BONE MARROW , 1973 .

[24]  T. Ha,et al.  Role of the thymus in tolerance. X. "Suppressor" activity of antigen-stimulated rat thymocytes transferred to normal recipients. , 1973, Journal of immunology.

[25]  R. Dutton INHIBITORY AND STIMULATORY EFFECTS OF CONCANAVALIN A ON THE RESPONSE OF MOUSE SPLEEN CELL SUSPENSIONS TO ANTIGEN , 1972, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[26]  B. Benacerraf,et al.  Radioresistance of carrier-specific helper thymus-derived lymphocytes in mice. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Tada,et al.  Regulation of homocytotropic antibody formation in the rat. V, Cell cooperation in the anti-hapten homocytotropic antibody response. , 1971, Journal of immunology.

[28]  G. Garratty,et al.  Studies on the immune response to penicillin and cephalothin in humans. I. Optimal conditions for titration of hemagglutinating penicillin and cephalothin antibodies. , 1971, Journal of immunology.

[29]  A. Davies,et al.  Pre-emption in Immunity , 1971, Nature.

[30]  F. Blank,et al.  An immunogenic polysaccharide-protein conju- gate. , 1970, Journal of immunology.

[31]  A. Cunningham,et al.  Further improvements in the plaque technique for detecting single antibody-forming cells. , 1968, Immunology.

[32]  H. Pross,et al.  Antigenic competition: a review of nonspecific antigen-induced suppression. , 1974, Advances in immunology.

[33]  R. Gershon T cell control of antibody production. , 1974, Contemporary topics in immunobiology.