Criteria and Evaluation for Ontology Modularization Techniques

While many authors have argued for the benefits of applying principles of modularization to ontologies, there is not yet a common understanding of how modules are defined and what properties they should have. In the previous section, this question was addressed from a purely logical point of view. In this chapter, we take a broader view on possible criteria that can be used to determine the quality of a modules. Such criteria include logic-based, but also structural and application-dependent criteria, sometimes borrowing from related fields such as software engineering. We give an overview of possible criteria and identify a lack of application-dependent quality measures. We further report some modularization experiments and discuss the role of quality criteria and evaluation in the context of these experiments.

[1]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Structure-Based Partitioning of Large Concept Hierarchies , 2004, SEMWEB.

[2]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Specifying Ontology Views by Traversal , 2004, International Semantic Web Conference.

[3]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis , 2005 .

[4]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Magpie - Towards a Semantic Web Browser , 2003, SEMWEB.

[5]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Modularization: a Key for the Dynamic Selection of Relevant Knowledge Components , 2006, WoMO.

[6]  Sheila A. McIlraith,et al.  Practical Partition-Based Theorem Proving for Large Knowledge Bases , 2003, IJCAI.

[7]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use , 2006, WWW '06.

[8]  B. Parsia,et al.  Combining OWL Ontologies Using E-Connections , 2005 .

[9]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  A Logical Framework for Modularity of Ontologies , 2007, IJCAI.

[10]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Ontology Selection for the Real Semantic Web: How to Cover the Queen's Birthday Dinner? , 2006, EKAW.

[11]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  A Metrics Suite for Object Oriented Design , 2015, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[12]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  Automatic Partitioning of OWL Ontologies Using E-Connections , 2005, Description Logics.

[13]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Towards Structural Criteria for Ontology Modularization , 2006, WoMO.

[14]  Letha H. Etzkorn,et al.  Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application , 2005 .

[15]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Applying KAoS Services to Ensure Policy Compliance for Semantic Web Services Workflow Composition and Enactment , 2004, SEMWEB.

[16]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks, 15th International Conference, EKAW 2006, Podebrady, Czech Republic, October 2-6, 2006, Proceedings , 2006, EKAW.

[17]  Frank Loebe,et al.  Requirements for Logical Modules , 2006, WoMO.

[18]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Data Driven Ontology Evaluation , 2004, LREC.

[19]  Bijan Parsia,et al.  Modularity and Web Ontologies , 2006, KR.

[20]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.