A theoretical model of honeycomb material arresting system for aircrafts

Abstract Takeoff and landing overruns account for most of the accidents that occur on or in the immediate vicinity of the runway, and it would cause accidental aircraft damage and loss of life. The current Engineered Material Arresting System (EMAS) materials are weak in water resistance and durability, expensive in acquiring and installing, and have negative environmental impacts. So it is significantly required to find a new alternative material with good mechanical properties, higher arresting coefficient and excellent environmental performance. In this article, the arresting properties of metal honeycomb material are studied. A Tire-Honeycomb material Interaction Mechanical Model (THIMM) is proposed. Combining with the dynamic model of aircraft, the theoretical model is coded by MATLAB to finish arresting simulation on aircraft B737-900ER and B727-100. In addition, finite element model of the tire-honeycomb material interaction was built to verify the correctness of the theoretical model. The results obtained by finite element simulation are in a good agreement with the theoretical results. In comparison with the results for traditional materials, the calculated results show that the honeycomb material can stop the overrunning aircraft more efficiently in the condition that the forces induced by the stopping process are safe for the passengers and aircraft.

[1]  Choon Chiang Foo,et al.  A modified energy-balance model to predict low-velocity impact response for sandwich composites , 2011 .

[2]  Kong Xiangjun,et al.  Phenomena of Foamed Concrete under Rolling of Aircraft Wheels , 2014 .

[3]  I Pritchard Jocelyn An Overview of Landing Gear Dynamics , 1999 .

[4]  Rosa María Arnaldo Valdés,et al.  The development of probabilistic models to estimate accident risk (due to runway overrun and landing undershoot) applicable to the design and construction of runway safety areas , 2011 .

[5]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  An analytical model of foamed concrete aircraft arresting system , 2013 .

[6]  David H. Chester Aircraft Landing Impact Parametric Study with Emphasis on Nose Gear Landing Conditions , 2002 .

[7]  Jim Hall,et al.  Modelling the location and consequences of aircraft accidents , 2013 .

[8]  E. Bade Soft-ground arresting of civil aircraft , 1968 .

[9]  Anthony G Gerardi Collection of Commercial Aircraft Characteristics for Study of Runway Roughness , 1977 .

[10]  W. M. Hale,et al.  Optimizing Low Density Concrete Behavior for Soft Ground Arrestor Systems , 2008 .

[11]  Ernest Heymsfield Jet Stopping Distance and Behavior in a Regional Airport EMAS , 2016 .

[12]  Wang Qi,et al.  Modeling and adaptive control of magneto-rheological buffer system for aircraft landing gear , 2015 .

[13]  George R. Doyle A Review of Computer Simulations for Aircraft-Surface Dynamics , 1986 .

[14]  W K San Filippo,et al.  ENGINEERED MATERIALS ARRESTING SYSTEM (EMAS): AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION TO RUNWAY OVERRUNS , 2002 .

[15]  Ernest P Heymsfield,et al.  Performance Prediction of the Strong Company’s Soft Ground Arrestor SystemUsing a Numerical Analysis , 2009 .

[16]  Jing Li,et al.  Haze, public health and mitigation measures in China: A review of the current evidence for further policy response. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Satish K Agrawal,et al.  Soft Ground Arresting System for Airports , 1993 .

[18]  Ernest Heymsfield,et al.  Aircraft response in an airfield arrestor system during an overrun , 2012 .

[19]  Emanuele Sacchi,et al.  Performance of New Materials for Aircraft Arrestor Beds , 2010 .

[20]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs : a finite element study , 2003 .

[21]  John W. Rustenburg,et al.  Side Load Factor Statistics From Commercial Aircraft Ground Operations , 2003 .

[22]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  THEORY OF PLATES AND SHELLS , 1959 .

[23]  Bin Liang,et al.  Preparation of ceramic foams suitable for aircraft arresting by the airport runway based on a protein foaming agent , 2014, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed..

[24]  David J. Stevens,et al.  Developing Improved Civil Aircraft Arresting Systems , 2009 .

[25]  C. A. Calder,et al.  Plastic deformation and perforation of thin plates resulting from projectile impact , 1971 .

[26]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  Theoretical analysis and multi-objective optimisation for gradient engineering material arresting system , 2017 .

[27]  N. Fleck,et al.  The out-of-plane compressive behaviour of woven-core sandwich plates , 2004 .

[28]  C. Cho,et al.  A new indentation model for sandwich circular panels with gradient metallic foam cores , 2015 .

[29]  N. S. Currey,et al.  Aircraft landing gear design : principles and practices , 1988 .

[30]  Robert Cook Soft-Ground Arresting System for Commercial Aircraft , 1993 .

[31]  J. M. Alexander AN APPROXIMATE ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF THIN CYLINDRICAL SHELLS UNDER AXIAL LOADING , 1960 .

[32]  Thomas DeFiore,et al.  METHODS FOR EXPERIMENTALLY DETERMINING COMMERCIAL JET AIRCRAFT LANDING PARAMETERS FROM VIDEO IMAGE DATA. , 1993 .

[33]  H. Naguib,et al.  Analysis and homogenization of functionally graded viscoelastic porous structures with a higher order plate theory and statistical based model of cellular distribution , 2016 .

[34]  Tongxi Yu,et al.  Energy Absorption of Structures and Materials , 2003 .

[35]  Michelle S. Hoo Fatt,et al.  Localized damage response of composite sandwich plates , 1999 .

[36]  Jialing Yang,et al.  Improving safety of runway overrun through foamed concrete aircraft arresting system: an experimental study , 2015 .

[37]  Ernie Heymsfield,et al.  A Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of Soft Ground Arrestor Systems , 2007 .

[38]  Pedro Romero,et al.  Investigation of existing engineered material Arresting system at three u.S. Airports , 2009 .