Visual complexity in banner ads

Two studies investigate visual complexity in banner ads and support predictions based on the resource‐matching perspective, which suggests that processing is optimized when the resources required to process a stimulus match the resources available. A content analysis of actual banner ads indicates that Internet advertising tends to rely on a moderate degree of visual complexity. This implies that advertisers’ experience may be encouraging them to combine visual elements, such as color, line art, photography, animated text, and animated visuals for moderate complexity, which should improve message processing. A follow‐up experiment verifies that, when processing resources are constrained, memory is better for images with moderate visual complexity than for simpler or more complex images.

[1]  Benjamin H. Detenber,et al.  The impact of color on emotional responses to newspaper photographs , 2001 .

[2]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes , 1995 .

[3]  James H. Watt,et al.  Visual Complexity and Young Children's Learning from Television. , 1982 .

[4]  Bruce Garrison,et al.  How Six Online Newspapers Use Web Technologies , 2001 .

[5]  Marvin J. Dainoff,et al.  Advertisement Complexity and Looking Time , 1972 .

[6]  Hairong Li,et al.  Cognitive Impact of Banner Ad Characteristics: An Experimental Study , 1999 .

[7]  Kathy Gilbert,et al.  Effects of Color and Complexity in Still Photographs on Mental Effort and Memory , 1990 .

[8]  Daniel Starch,et al.  Principles of advertising , 1923 .

[9]  Katherine Gallagher,et al.  The Medium Is Not the Message: Advertising Effectiveness and Content Evaluation in Print and on the Web , 2001, Journal of Advertising Research.

[10]  R. Simons,et al.  Roll ‘em!: The effects of picture motion on emotional responses , 1998 .

[11]  Annie Lang,et al.  The Effects of Edits on Arousal, Attention, and Memory for Television Messages: When an Edit Is an Edit Can an Edit Be Too Much? , 2000 .

[12]  N. Hollis,et al.  Advertising on the Web: is there response before click-through? , 1997 .

[13]  G H Ritchey.  Pictorial detail and recall in adults and children. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  B. Tversky,et al.  Memory for faces: Are caricatures better than photographs? , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Sheree Josephson.  Questioning the power of color , 1996 .

[16]  Xueli Huang,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness of the Web Site with Traditional Media , 1998 .

[17]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[18]  David R. Thompson,et al.  Few Newspapers Use Online Classified Interactive Features , 2001 .

[19]  David Micklos,et al.  Visual Complexity and the Function of Graphics in "Scientific American" and "Science 81.". , 1982 .

[20]  Adam Finn,et al.  Print Ad Recognition Readership Scores: An Information Processing Perspective , 1988 .

[21]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Enhancing and Measuring Consumers’ Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads , 1991 .

[22]  Louis H. Berry,et al.  Visual Complexity and Pictorial Memory: A Fifteen Year Research Perspective. , 1991 .

[23]  S. Willis,et al.  Gender Differences and Changes in Cognitive Abilities Across the Adult Life Span , 2000 .

[24]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Ease of message processing as a moderator of repetition effects in advertising. , 1990 .

[25]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  Principles of Internet Marketing , 1999 .

[26]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[27]  R. Dixon,et al.  Longitudinal changes in quantitative and qualitative indicators of word and story recall in young-old and old-old adults. , 1999, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[28]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies , 1991 .