Reliability and Minimal Clinically Important Differences of FVC. Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS‐I and SLS‐II)

Rationale: FVC percent predicted (FVC%) is the primary outcome measure in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease. For interpretation of change in the FVC% over time, it is important to define whether these changes are clinically meaningful. Objectives:: To assess the reliability and the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for FVC% in the Scleroderma Lung Study I and II (SLS‐I and ‐II). Methods: Using data from SLS‐I and ‐II (N = 300), we evaluated the test‐retest reliability for FVC% (screening vs. baseline) using intraclass correlation. MCID estimates at 12 months were calculated in the pooled cohort (SLS‐I and ‐II) using two anchors: Transition Dyspnea Index (≥change of 1.5 units for improvement and worsening, respectively) and the Medical Outcomes Short Form‐36 Health Transition question (“Compared with one year ago, how would you rate your health in general now”?), where “somewhat better” or “somewhat worse” were defined as the MCID estimates. We next assessed the association of MCID estimates for improvement and worsening of FVC% with patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) and computer‐assisted quantitation of extent of fibrosis (QLF) and of total interstitial lung disease (QILD) on high‐resolution computed tomography. Student's t test was used to compare the mean difference in outcomes between the MCID improvement/worsening and the “no change” group. Measurements and Main Results: Reliability of FVC%, assessed at a mean of 34 days, intraclass correlation was 0.93 for the pooled cohort. The MCID estimates for the pooled cohort at 12 months for FVC% improvement ranged from 3.0% to 5.3% and for worsening from −3.0% to −3.3%. FVC% improvement by greater than or equal to MCID was associated with either statistically significant or numerical improvements in some PROs, QILD, and QLF, whereas FVC% worsening greater than or equal to MCID was associated with statistically significant or numerical worsening of PROs, QILD, and QLF. Conclusions: FVC% has acceptable test‐retest reliability, and we have provided the MCID estimates for FVC% in systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease‐based changes at 12 months from baseline in two clinical trials. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00004563 for SLS‐I and NCT00883129 for SLS‐II).

[1]  J. Goldin,et al.  Interstitial lung disease points to consider for clinical trials in systemic sclerosis , 2017, Rheumatology.

[2]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Improved Cough and Cough‐Specific Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Scleroderma‐Related Interstitial Lung Disease: Results of Scleroderma Lung Study II , 2017, Chest.

[3]  S. Reise,et al.  Responsiveness to Change and Minimally Important Differences of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scales , 2017, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[4]  J. Hobart,et al.  Clinician-Reported Outcome Assessments of Treatment Benefit: Report of the ISPOR Clinical Outcome Assessment Emerging Good Practices Task Force. , 2017, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[5]  G. Raghu,et al.  An Open-label, Phase II Study of the Safety and Tolerability of Pirfenidone in Patients with Scleroderma-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: the LOTUSS Trial , 2016, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[6]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Oral Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma-related Interstitial Lung Disease: Scleroderma Lung Study II (SLS-II), a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.

[7]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Transitions to different patterns of interstitial lung disease in scleroderma with and without treatment , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  M. Mayes,et al.  Reliability, validity and responsiveness to change of the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire in early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. , 2015, Rheumatology.

[9]  A. Azuma,et al.  A Phase 3 Trial of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis , 2015 .

[10]  R. Sussman,et al.  A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  H. Collard,et al.  Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  T. Fleming,et al.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trials , 2012, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Ron D. Hays,et al.  The Concept of Clinically Meaningful Difference in Health-Related Quality-of-Life Research , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[14]  S. Sahn,et al.  Forced vital capacity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: test properties and minimal clinically important difference. , 2011, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[15]  M. Mayes,et al.  A one-year, phase I/IIa, open-label pilot trial of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated active interstitial lung disease. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  Sumit K. Shah,et al.  Quantitative texture-based assessment of one-year changes in fibrotic reticular patterns on HRCT in scleroderma lung disease treated with oral cyclophosphamide , 2011, European Radiology.

[17]  V. Fonollosa-Plá,et al.  Effect of mycophenolate sodium in scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease , 2011, Clinical Rheumatology.

[18]  G. Raghu,et al.  The SF-36 and SGRQ: validity and first look at minimum important differences in IPF. , 2010, Respiratory medicine.

[19]  G. Raghu,et al.  The 6 minute walk in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: longitudinal changes and minimum important difference. , 2010, Thorax.

[20]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Minimally important differences in the Mahler's Transition Dyspnoea Index in a large randomized controlled trial--results from the Scleroderma Lung Study. , 2009, Rheumatology.

[21]  R. Hays,et al.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  Xiaohong Yan,et al.  Impact of oral cyclophosphamide on health-related quality of life in patients with active scleroderma lung disease: results from the scleroderma lung study. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  T. Medsger,et al.  Changes in causes of death in systemic sclerosis, 1972–2002 , 2007, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  B. Thiers Cyclophosphamide versus Placebo in Scleroderma Lung Disease , 2007 .

[25]  P. Emery,et al.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids and intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by oral azathioprine for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis in scleroderma. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[26]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Standardisation of spirometry , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[27]  R. Hays,et al.  Responsiveness of the SF-36 and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index in a systemic sclerosis clinical trial. , 2005, The Journal of rheumatology.

[28]  P. Jones St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID , 2005, COPD.

[29]  R. Hays,et al.  Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[30]  Sally J. Singh,et al.  Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) , 2003, Thorax.

[31]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey Update , 2000, Spine.

[32]  M. Mayes,et al.  Correlates of the disability index of the health assessment questionnaire: a measure of functional impairment in systemic sclerosis. , 1999, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[33]  P. Jones,et al.  The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. , 1991, Respiratory medicine.

[34]  C. Wells,et al.  The measurement of dyspnea. Contents, interobserver agreement, and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes. , 1984, Chest.

[35]  R. Rogers,et al.  Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant? , 1981, Chest.

[36]  H. Holman,et al.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. , 1980, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[37]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.