A continuous responder algorithm to optimize clinical management of small-cell lung cancer with progastrin-releasing peptide as a simple blood test

This study aimed to investigate whether changes in progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) levels correlate with treatment response and can be used to optimize clinical management of patients with small-cell lung cancer. Patients with small-cell lung cancer (any stage) receiving chemotherapy were eligible. ProGRP was measured in serum/plasma at baseline and after each chemotherapy cycle using the Elecsys® ProGRP assay (Roche Diagnostics). Treatment response was assessed by computed tomography scan. The primary objective was to examine whether changes in ProGRP levels correlated with computed tomography scan results after two cycles of chemotherapy. The prognostic value of ProGRP among patients receiving first-line chemotherapy was also assessed. Overall, 261 patients from six centers were eligible. Among patients with elevated baseline ProGRP (>100 pg/mL), a ProGRP decline after Cycle 2 was associated with nonprogression (area under the curve: 84%; 95% confidence interval: 72.8–95.1; n = 141). ProGRP changes from baseline to end of Cycle 1 were predictive of response, as determined by computed tomography scan 3 weeks later (area under the curve: 87%; 95% confidence interval: 74.1−99.2; n = 137). This was enhanced by repeat measurements, with a 92% area under the curve (95% confidence interval: 85.3−97.8) among patients with ProGRP data after both Cycles 1 and 2 (n = 123); if a patient experienced a ≥25% decline in ProGRP after Cycle 1, and ProGRP remained stable or decreased after Cycle 2, the probability of finding progression on the interim computed tomography scan at the end of Cycle 2 was almost zero (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 71%). Both ProGRP levels at baseline and at the end of first-line chemotherapy were prognostic; the latter provided a moderately improved hazard ratio of 2.43 (95% confidence interval: 1.33–4.46; n = 110) versus 1.87 (95% confidence interval: 1.04–3.37; n = 216). In summary, for patients with small-cell lung cancer and elevated baseline ProGRP levels, ProGRP may be a simple, reliable, and repeatable tool for monitoring response to chemotherapy and provide valuable prognostic information.

[1]  M. Perelman,et al.  New ARCHITECT plasma pro-gastrin-releasing peptide assay for diagnosing and monitoring small-cell lung cancer , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  F. Koinis,et al.  Small cell lung cancer (SCLC): no treatment advances in recent years. , 2016, Translational lung cancer research.

[3]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Treatment of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the American College of Chest Physicians Guideline. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  D. de Ruysscher,et al.  Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  B. Chan,et al.  Chemotherapy advances in small-cell lung cancer. , 2013, Journal of thoracic disease.

[6]  Michael Peyton,et al.  Proteomic profiling identifies dysregulated pathways in small cell lung cancer and novel therapeutic targets including PARP1. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[7]  M. Chalhoub,et al.  Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology R a P I D C O M M U N I C a T I O N Small Cell Lung Cancer Doubling Time and Its Effect on Clinical Presentation: a Concise Review , 2022 .

[8]  Chu Chen,et al.  Diagnostic value of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide for small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis , 2011, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[9]  T. Peretz,et al.  The diagnostic and prognostic value of ProGRP in lung cancer. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[10]  N. Viñolas,et al.  Usefulness of Serum Tumor Markers, Including Progastrin-Releasing Peptide, in Patients with Lung Cancer: Correlation with Histology , 2009, Tumor Biology.

[11]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Nucleosomes, ProGRP, NSE, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA in Monitoring First-Line Chemotherapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  M. Leeflang,et al.  Bias in sensitivity and specificity caused by data-driven selection of optimal cutoff values: mechanisms, magnitude, and solutions. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  James L Mulshine,et al.  Lung cancer screening. , 2005, The oncologist.

[14]  I. Tannock,et al.  Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Lamy,et al.  Neuroendocrine and cytokeratin serum markers as prognostic determinants of small cell lung cancer. , 2003, Lung cancer.

[16]  John Eng,et al.  Lung cancer screening with helical computed tomography in older adult smokers: a decision and cost-effectiveness analysis. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  H. Dienemann,et al.  Comparison of changes in the NSE levels with clinical assessment in the therapy monitoring of patients with SCLC. , 2002, Anticancer research.

[18]  K. Kiura,et al.  Complementary roles of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in diagnosis and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). , 2001, Lung cancer.

[19]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Significance of serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide as a predictor of relapse of small cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase and carcinoembryonic antigen. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[20]  R. Simon,et al.  A simulation study of cross-validation for selecting an optimal cutpoint in univariate survival analysis. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide(31-98) is a specific tumor marker in patients with small cell lung carcinoma. , 1994, Cancer research.

[22]  H. Liu,et al.  Treatment of small cell lung cancer. , 1991, Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih.

[23]  M. Cozijnsen,et al.  Prognostic value of serum thymidine kinase, tissue polypeptide antigen and neuron specific enolase in patients with small cell lung cancer. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  L. Qiu,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of a new progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) immunoassay across Europe and China. , 2015, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[25]  D. Brizel,et al.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology , 2012 .

[26]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[27]  E. Feuer,et al.  SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003 , 2006 .

[28]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.