Multi-objective optimization of tumor response to drug release from vasculature-bound nanoparticles

The pharmacokinetics of nanoparticle-borne drugs targeting tumors depends critically on nanoparticle design. Empirical approaches to evaluate such designs in order to maximize treatment efficacy are time- and cost-intensive. We have recently proposed the use of computational modeling of nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery targeting tumor vasculature coupled with numerical optimization to pursue optimal nanoparticle targeting and tumor uptake. Here, we build upon these studies to evaluate the effect of tumor size on optimal nanoparticle design by considering a cohort of heterogeneously-sized tumor lesions, as would be clinically expected. The results indicate that smaller nanoparticles yield higher tumor targeting and lesion regression for larger-sized tumors. We then augment the nanoparticle design optimization problem by considering drug diffusivity, which yields a two-fold tumor size decrease compared to optimizing nanoparticles without this consideration. We quantify the tradeoff between tumor targeting and size decrease using bi-objective optimization, and generate five Pareto-optimal nanoparticle designs. The results provide a spectrum of treatment outcomes – considering tumor targeting vs. antitumor effect – with the goal to enable therapy customization based on clinical need. This approach could be extended to other nanoparticle-based cancer therapies, and support the development of personalized nanomedicine in the longer term.

[1]  J. L. Boldrini,et al.  Therapy burden, drug resistance, and optimal treatment regimen for cancer chemotherapy. , 2000, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[2]  Yechezkel Barenholz,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin , 2003, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[3]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Biomarkers in Cancer Staging, Prognosis and Treatment Selection , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  M. Ferrari,et al.  A Theoretical Model for the Margination of Particles within Blood Vessels , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Charles Audet,et al.  Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[6]  M Ferrari,et al.  The adhesive strength of non-spherical particles mediated by specific interactions. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[7]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modelling of dynamic adaptive tumour-induced angiogenesis: clinical implications and therapeutic targeting strategies. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Xiao-Feng Li,et al.  Hypoxia in microscopic tumors. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[9]  B. Ploeger,et al.  Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling in translational drug research. , 2008, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[10]  Sébastien Le Digabel NOMAD: Nonlinear Optimization with the MADS Algorithm , 2009 .

[11]  S. McDougall,et al.  Multiscale modelling and nonlinear simulation of vascular tumour growth , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[12]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[13]  Li Tiancheng,et al.  アルゴリズム906: elrint3d―組み込み格子ルールのシーケンスを用いる三次元非適応自動立体求積法ルーチン , 2011 .

[14]  M. Graham,et al.  Segregation by membrane rigidity in flowing binary suspensions of elastic capsules. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  A. M. Rush,et al.  X-ray computed tomography imaging of breast cancer by using targeted peptide-labeled bismuth sulfide nanoparticles. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[16]  Sébastien Le Digabel,et al.  Algorithm xxx : NOMAD : Nonlinear Optimization with the MADS algorithm , 2010 .

[17]  R. Jain,et al.  Normalization of tumour blood vessels improves the delivery of nanomedicines in a size-dependent manner , 2012, Nature nanotechnology.

[18]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Integrated intravital microscopy and mathematical modeling to optimize nanotherapeutics delivery to tumors. , 2012, AIP advances.

[19]  Min Wu,et al.  The effect of interstitial pressure on tumor growth: coupling with the blood and lymphatic vascular systems. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  On exploring structure-activity relationships. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[21]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  A Computational Model for Predicting Nanoparticle Accumulation in Tumor Vasculature , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  Paolo Decuzzi,et al.  On the near-wall accumulation of injectable particles in the microcirculation: smaller is not better , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Gerhard Gompper,et al.  Margination of micro- and nano-particles in blood flow and its effect on drug delivery , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Mark A. J. Chaplain,et al.  The effect of interstitial pressure on therapeutic agent transport: coupling with the tumor blood and lymphatic vascular systems. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  M. Steven Greene,et al.  Quantifying uncertainties in the microvascular transport of nanoparticles , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[26]  Kassandra M. Fronczyk,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the analysis of quantal bioassay studies using nonparametric mixture models , 2014, Biometrics.

[27]  Chin F. Ng,et al.  A Review of Pharmacological Treatment Options for Lung Cancer: Emphasis on Novel Nanotherapeutics and Associated Toxicity. , 2015, Current drug targets.

[28]  Hermann B. Frieboes,et al.  Computational Modeling of Tumor Response to Drug Release from Vasculature-Bound Nanoparticles , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Aaron M Mohs,et al.  Image-guided tumor surgery: will there be a role for fluorescent nanoparticles? , 2016, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[30]  A. Gupta Role of particle size, shape, and stiffness in design of intravascular drug delivery systems: insights from computations, experiments, and nature. , 2016 .

[31]  Hermann B. Frieboes,et al.  A Computational/Experimental Assessment of Antitumor Activity of Polymer Nanoassemblies for pH-Controlled Drug Delivery to Primary and Metastatic Tumors , 2016, Pharmaceutical Research.

[32]  João F Mano,et al.  Design Advances in Particulate Systems for Biomedical Applications , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[33]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Enhanced performance of macrophage-encapsulated nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel in hypo-perfused cancer lesions. , 2016, Nanoscale.

[34]  Hermann B Frieboes,et al.  The Tumor Microenvironment as a Barrier to Cancer Nanotherapy. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[35]  John Lowengrub,et al.  An interdisciplinary computational/experimental approach to evaluate drug-loaded gold nanoparticle tumor cytotoxicity. , 2016, Nanomedicine.

[36]  Chip M. Lynch,et al.  Application of unsupervised analysis techniques to lung cancer patient data , 2017, PloS one.

[37]  Dandan Guo,et al.  Riboflavin-containing telodendrimer nanocarriers for efficient doxorubicin delivery: High loading capacity, increased stability, and improved anticancer efficacy. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[38]  James A. Bartholomai,et al.  Prediction of lung cancer patient survival via supervised machine learning classification techniques , 2017, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[39]  Eva Bezak,et al.  A review of the development of tumor vasculature and its effects on the tumor microenvironment , 2017, Hypoxia.

[40]  Jennifer I. Hare,et al.  Challenges and strategies in anti-cancer nanomedicine development: An industry perspective. , 2017, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[41]  Biana Godin,et al.  Macrophage Polarization Contributes to the Anti-Tumoral Efficacy of Mesoporous Nanovectors Loaded with Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[42]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Toxic effects and biodistribution of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles , 2017, Archives of Toxicology.

[43]  A. Mastroberardino,et al.  An Optimal Control Approach for the Treatment of Solid Tumors with Angiogenesis Inhibitors , 2017 .

[44]  W. Muller,et al.  Progressive polarity loss and luminal collapse disrupt tissue organization in carcinoma , 2017, Genes & development.

[45]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  Industry Perspective , 2017, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[46]  M. Kokkolaras,et al.  Design Optimization of Tumor Vasculature-Bound Nanoparticles , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Robert A. Gatenby,et al.  Optimal control to develop therapeutic strategies for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  M. Kokkolaras,et al.  Nanoparticle Optimization for Enhanced Targeted Anticancer Drug Delivery. , 2017, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[49]  H. Frieboes,et al.  Evaluation of Drug-Loaded Gold Nanoparticle Cytotoxicity as a Function of Tumor Vasculature-Induced Tissue Heterogeneity , 2018, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Influence of particle size and shape on their margination and wall-adhesion: implications in drug delivery vehicle design across nano-to-micro scale. , 2018, Nanoscale.

[51]  Hermann B. Frieboes,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor-immune cell interactions. , 2019, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  Jeffrey Dean,et al.  Machine Learning in Medicine , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  V. Weaver,et al.  The Extracellular Matrix Modulates the Metastatic Journey. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[54]  H. Frieboes,et al.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamics Modeling of Drug-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Targeting Heterogeneously Vascularized Tumor Tissue , 2019, Pharmaceutical Research.

[55]  Neha Sharma,et al.  Nanoinformatics and biomolecular nanomodeling: a novel move en route for effective cancer treatment , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[56]  Katarzyna A Rejniak,et al.  Hybrid modeling frameworks of tumor development and treatment , 2019, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[57]  H. Frieboes,et al.  Nonlinear response to cancer nanotherapy due to macrophage interactions revealed by mathematical modeling and evaluated in a murine model via CRISPR-modulated macrophage polarization , 2020, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.