Optimizing Regional Earthquake Mitigation Investment Strategies

Regional mitigation analysis is a systematic procedure to determine how much to spend on mitigation versus post-event reconstruction and to prioritize alternative mitigation strategies. It requires at least the following information: magnitude and character of the regional risk, costs and benefits associated with all possible mitigation alternatives, available budget, and specific regional objectives for risk management. Currently available loss estimation models provide increasingly comprehensive estimates of regional risk, but offer little guidance about how to use that information to make mitigation resource allocation decisions. This paper describes a linear program developed to support systematic regional earthquake mitigation analysis, and illustrates its application through a case study in Los Angeles County. Results suggest which buildings—by structural type, occupancy type, and census tract location—should be upgraded so as to minimize total mitigation and expected post-earthquake reconstruction costs.

[1]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Probabilistic Earthquake Scenarios: Extending Risk Analysis Methodologies to Spatially Distributed Systems , 2000 .

[2]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Multicriteria Planning of Post‐Earthquake Sustainable Reconstruction , 2002 .

[3]  A. Amendola,et al.  A Systems Approach to Modeling Catastrophic Risk and Insurability , 2000 .

[4]  Craig E. Taylor,et al.  Walkthrough Method for Catastrophe Decision Making , 2001 .

[5]  D. Mileti.  Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States , 1999 .

[6]  Kyriazis Pitilakis,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings in Thessaloniki, bases on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment , 1996 .

[7]  Shiro Takada,et al.  Seismic Risk Assessment and Upgrade Strategy of Hospital-lifeline Performance , 2003 .

[8]  Chris Cyr,et al.  USING COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE MITIGATION FOR LIFELINE SYSTEMS , 2000 .

[9]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  A Social Decision Analysis of the Earthquake Safety Problem: The Case of Existing Los Angeles Buildings , 1983 .

[10]  Yuri M. Ermoliev,et al.  A system approach to management of catastrophic risks , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Richard Bernknopf,et al.  A Portfolio Approach to Evaluating Natural Hazard Mitigation Policies: An Application to Lateral-Spread Ground Failure in Coastal California , 2001 .

[12]  Yuri Ermoliev,et al.  Earthquake risk management: A case study for an Italian region , 2000 .

[13]  J. Gluck,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Design Codes—Case of Seismic Design , 1996 .

[14]  Craig E. Taylor,et al.  Seismic Risk Reduction Planning for Ports Lifelines , 1999 .

[15]  Giuliano Augusti,et al.  Optimal allocation of resources in reduction of the seismic risk of highway networks , 1994 .

[16]  James Douglas Englehardt,et al.  A Bayesian Benefit‐Risk Model Applied to the South Florida Building Code , 1995 .

[17]  S. D. Werner,et al.  Proposed Acceptable Earthquake Risk Procedures for the Port of Los Angeles 2020 Expansion Program , 1995 .

[18]  Ugo Morelli.  Preventing Earthquake Disasters - The Grand Challenge in Earthquake Engineering - A Research Agenda for the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) , 2004 .

[19]  Camillo Nuti,et al.  Assessment of post-earthquake availability of hospital system and upgrading strategies , 1998 .

[20]  Katsuhiko Ishida,et al.  A METHOD FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT PLANNING OF SUBSTATION COMPONENTS ON THE BASIS OF THE COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[21]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Integrated Modeling of Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneities and Decisions Induced by Catastrophic Events , 2003 .