The Dynamics of Material Artifacts in Collaborative Research Teams

Boundary objects are material artifacts that mediate the relationship between two or more disparate perspectives. The concept of boundary objects has been demonstrably useful in a variety of research areas; however, the meaning and function of boundary objects is contested. At issue is the relationship between boundary objects that negotiate between perspectives and those that specify across perspectives. In this study the changing nature of boundary objects in cooperative work is related to the dynamics of evolving problem conceptualization, system design, and enactment within cooperative work settings. Design based research on material artifacts produced by an incipient cross-disciplinary research team during their efforts towards negotiating integrated conceptualizations and specifying shared research agendas is used to generate a more comprehensive model of boundary objects through the life of a project.

[1]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[2]  R Bud,et al.  Biotechnology in the Twentieth Century , 1991, Social studies of science.

[3]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Boundary Objects and Prototypes at the Interfaces of Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[4]  Duncan Sanderson,et al.  Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artefacts , 1998 .

[5]  Carla Simone,et al.  Coordination mechanisms: Towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design , 1996, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[6]  Jean-François Boujut,et al.  The Role of Objects in Design Co-Operation: Communication through Physical or Virtual Objects , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[8]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[9]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Beyond Boundary Objects: Collaborative Reuse in Aircraft Technical Support , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  Elke Duncker,et al.  Symbolic Communication in Multidisciplinary Cooperations , 2001 .

[11]  Sigmar-Olaf Tergan,et al.  Knowledge and Information Visualization: searching for synergies , 2005 .

[12]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[13]  W. Sandoval,et al.  Design-Based Research Methods for Studying Learning in Context: Introduction , 2004 .

[14]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[15]  Naomi Miyake,et al.  Explorations of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom Systems , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[16]  B. Schutt.  Sorting things out. , 1970, The American journal of nursing.

[17]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[19]  Thomas Herrmann,et al.  The Metamorphoses of Workflow Projects in their Early Stages , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[20]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[21]  Deana Pennington,et al.  Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Learning , 2008 .

[22]  P. D. Magnus,et al.  Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science , 2007 .

[23]  Eric Blanco,et al.  Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[24]  Daniel C. Edelson.  Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[25]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[26]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[27]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[28]  P. Upham.  Scientific consensus on sustainability: the case of The Natural Step , 2000 .

[29]  Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman,et al.  Conceptual Models as Tools for Communication Across Disciplines , 2003 .

[30]  W. Sandoval.  Developing Learning Theory by Refining Conjectures Embodied in Educational Designs , 2004 .

[31]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Computer Support for Social Awareness in Flexible Work , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[32]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[33]  P. Jeffrey.  Smoothing the Waters , 2003 .

[34]  Katherine A. Lawrence.  Walking the Tightrope: The Balancing Acts of a Large e-Research Project , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[35]  Michael Wurst,et al.  Collaborative Knowledge Visualization for Cross-Community Learning , 2005, Knowledge and Information Visualization.