Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: Effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations

The efficacy of ‘Good Agricultural Practices’ (GAP) for reducing nitrate pollution is tested on the scale of a small catchment area (187 ha) which is almost entirely under arable agriculture. GAP have been introduced on all fields since 1990. They consist in applying carefully planned N fertiliser recommendations, establishing catch crops (CC) before spring crops and recycling all crop residues. Soil water and mineral nitrogen (SMN) were measured three times each year on 36 sites representative of crops (wheat, sugarbeet, pea, barley, oilseed rape) and soil materials (loam, loamy clay and rocks, sand loam and limestone, sand) during 8 years (1991‐1999). These measurements (about 3600 soil samples) were used in LIXIM model to calculate water and nitrogen fluxes below the rooting zone. The model could reproduce satisfactorily the water and SMN contents measured at the end of winter. It simulated reasonably well the nitrate concentration measured in the subsoil (3‐10 m deep) of nine fields. The mean calculated amounts of drained water and leached nitrogen below the rooting depth were 231 mm year � 1 and 27 kg N ha � 1 year � 1 , corresponding to a nitrate concentration of 49 mg L � 1 . Leached N varied by a five-, four- and threefold factor according to the year, crop and soil type, respectively. Nitrate concentration was primarily affected by soil type: it varied from 31 mg L � 1 in deep loamy soils to 92 mg L � 1 in shallow sandy soils, and was linked to the soil water holding capacity. The sugarbeet‐wheat rotation gave the lowest concentration (38 mg L � 1 ) and the pea‐wheat rotation the highest one (66 mg L � 1 ). In spite of their moderate growth (mean biomass = 0.8 Mg ha � 1 ), the catch crops allowed to reduce the mean concentration by 50% at the annual scale and 23% at the rotation scale. Straw incorporation was also beneficial since net mineralisation between harvestand late autumn was reduced by 24 kg N ha � 1 when strawresidues were incorporated. Reducing fertilisation below the recommended rate did not significantly reduce further nitrate leaching. Although GAP were not all optimal and therefore less efficient than in well controlled experiments, they appear essential in intensive agriculture in order to comply with the EU standard for nitrate concentration. # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  B. Chambers,et al.  Effects of repeated straw incorporation on crop fertilizer nitrogen requirements, soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate leaching losses , 1997 .

[2]  T. Rydberg,et al.  Soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate leaching losses in soil tillage systems combined with a catch crop , 1999 .

[3]  Eric Justes,et al.  Calculation of nitrogen mineralization and leaching in fallow soil using a simple dynamic model , 1999 .

[4]  H. C. Van Ommen The “mixing-cell” concept applied to transport of non-reactive and reactive components in soils and groundwater , 1985 .

[5]  N. Haruvy,et al.  Cost assessment of various means of averting environmental damage and groundwater contamination from nitrate seepage , 1997 .

[6]  A. Olness,et al.  Farming, Fertilizers and the Nitrate Problem , 1993 .

[7]  T. H. Webb,et al.  Relative effect of climate, soil, and management on risk of nitrate leaching under wheat production in Canterbury, New Zealand , 2003 .

[8]  G. Richter,et al.  N-dynamics and nitrate leaching under rotational and continuous set-aside—a case study at the field and catchment scale , 1998 .

[9]  A. Gold,et al.  Incorporating Spatial Variability into GIS to Estimate Nitrate Leaching at the Aquifer Scale , 1996 .

[10]  J. Neeteson,et al.  Nitrogen Mineralization in Agricultural Soils: Foreword , 1994 .

[11]  J. Refsgaard,et al.  Modeling Nitrate Leaching at Different Scales — Application of the DAISY Model , 2001 .

[12]  H. L. Penman Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  M. Shepherd,et al.  Nitrate leaching from a shallow limestone soil growing a five course combinable crop rotation: the effects of crop husbandry and nitrogen fertilizer rate on losses from the second complete rotation , 2002 .

[14]  S. Tyagi,et al.  Assessment of groundwater contamination from fertilizers in the Delhi area based on 180, N03− and K+ composition , 1997 .

[15]  D. Makowski,et al.  Models of yield, grain protein, and residual mineral nitrogen responses to applied nitrogen for winter wheat , 1999 .

[16]  R. Waskom,et al.  REGIONAL NITRATE LEACHING VARIABILITY: WHAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IN NORTHEASTERN COLORADO , 2001 .

[17]  Rebecca A. Kelly,et al.  Policies and tools for sustainable water management in the European Union , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Liwang Ma,et al.  Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management , 2001 .

[19]  S. Recous,et al.  STICS : a generic model for the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory, and parameterization applied to wheat and corn , 1998 .

[20]  F. Vinther Nitrogen fluxes in a cropped sandy and a loamy soil measured by sequential coring , 1994 .

[21]  H. Johnsson,et al.  A method for assessing generalised nitrogen leaching estimates for agricultural land , 1999 .

[22]  J. Richter,et al.  Significance of nitrate leaching and long term N immobilization after deepening the plough layers for the N regime of arable soils in N.W. Germany , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[23]  R. Ploeg,et al.  Late Fall Site-Specific Soil Nitrate Upper Limits for Groundwater Protection Purposes , 1995 .

[24]  K. Kersebaum,et al.  Performance of a Nitrogen Dynamics Model Applied to Evaluate Agricultural Management Practices , 2001 .

[25]  P. Milburn Nitrate concentration of subsurface drainage water from a corn field in southern New Brunswick , 1994 .

[26]  G. Vachaud,et al.  Evaluation of the WAVE Model for Predicting Nitrate Leaching for Two Contrasted Soil and Climate Conditions , 2003 .

[27]  J. Conway,et al.  Nitrogen leaching losses under a less intensive farming and environment (LIFE) integrated system , 2003 .

[28]  H. Beckie,et al.  Nitrogen contribution of field pea in annual cropping systems. 1. Nitrogen residual effect , 1997 .

[29]  S. E. Simmelsgaard The effect of crop, N‐level, soil type and drainage on nitrate leaching from Danish soil , 1998 .

[30]  Carl J. Rosen,et al.  Evaluation of Nitrate Leaching Potential in Minnesota Glacial Outwash Soils using the CERES-Maize Model , 1998 .

[31]  James W. Jones,et al.  Wading through a swamp of complete confusion: how to choose a method for estimating soil water retention parameters for crop models , 2002 .

[32]  R. Rees,et al.  Sustainable Management of Soil Organic Matter , 2000 .

[33]  David Makowski,et al.  Which decision support tools for the environmental management of nitrogen , 2002 .

[34]  H. Di,et al.  Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[35]  R. K. Hubbard,et al.  Nitrates in groundwater in the southeastern USA , 1994 .

[36]  E. Justes,et al.  Comparing the effectiveness of radish cover crop, oilseed rape volunteers and oilseed rape residues incorporation for reducing nitrate leaching , 1999, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[37]  C. Drury,et al.  Water and nitrate loss through tiles under a clay loam soil in Ontario after 42 years of consistent fertilization and crop rotation , 2002 .

[38]  S. Hansen,et al.  Introduction to Simulation of Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Soils , 2001 .

[39]  C. Campbell,et al.  Nitrogen contribution of field pea in annual cropping systems. 2. Total nitrogen benefit , 1997 .

[40]  L. Bruckler,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of nitrate in irrigated salad crops , 1997, Irrigation Science.