Mapping Experiment as a Learning Process: How the First Electromagnetic Motor Was Invented

Narrative accounts misrepresent discovery by reconstructing worlds ordered by success rather than the world as explored. Such worlds rarely contain the personal knowledge that informed actual exploration and experiment. This article describes an attempt to recover situated learning in a material environment, tracing the discovery of the first electromagnetic motor by Michael Faraday in September 1821 to show how he modeled new experience and invented procedures to communicate that novelty. The author introduces a notation to map experiment as an active process in a real-world environment and to display the human agency written out of most narratives. Comparing maps of accounts shows how knowledge-construction depends on narrative reconstruction. It is argued that invention processes can be interpreted in the same way as discovery, and a study is proposed to compare packaging learned skills into demonstration devices with the innovative strategies of inventors such as Edison. If situational knowledge is as important as is claimed, computationalists need to join science studies scholars in coming to grips with nonverbal and procedural aspects of discovery and invention.

[1]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[2]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[3]  David Gooding,et al.  How do scientists reach agreement about novel observations , 1986 .

[4]  D. Price PHILOSOPHICAL MECHANISM AND MECHANICAL PHILOSOPHY , 1980 .

[5]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[6]  Michael Faraday,et al.  Experimental Researches in Electricity , 1880, Nature.

[7]  W. Balzer,et al.  Scientific discovery, computational explorations of the creative processes , 1991 .

[8]  L. Williams Faraday and Ampère: A Critical Dialogue , 1985 .

[9]  Is the Scientific Paper a Fraud? or: Who's Got the Paper? , 1965, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  S. Shapin Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology , 1984 .

[12]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Procedural Representation in Michael Faraday's Scientific Thought , 1986, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[13]  F. Suppe The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories , 1977 .

[14]  K. Knorr-Cetina The Manufacture of Knowledge , 1981 .

[15]  T B Settle,et al.  An Experiment in the History of Science: With a simple but ingenious device Galileo could obtain relatively precise time measurements. , 1961, Science.

[16]  E. Ferguson The Mind’s Eye: Nonverbal thought in Technology , 1977 .

[17]  C. Wright Representing and Intervening , 1985 .

[18]  S. Dickman Living in a material world , 1988, Nature.

[19]  David Gooding,et al.  Experiment and the Making of Meaning , 1990 .

[20]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[21]  Robert S. Cohen,et al.  On Scientific Discovery , 1981 .

[22]  THOMAS MARTIN,et al.  Faraday's Diary. , 1930, Nature.

[23]  L. Williams What Were Ampere's Earliest Discoveries in Electrodynamics? , 1983, Isis.

[24]  Frank A. J. L. James,et al.  The Development of the Laboratory , 1989 .

[25]  David Gooding,et al.  ‘In Nature’s School’: Faraday as an Experimentalist , 1985 .

[26]  J. Woodroffe,et al.  A learning experience. , 1987, New Zealand hospital.

[27]  K. L. Caneva From Galvanism to Electrodynamics: The Transformation of German Physics and Its Social Context , 1978 .

[28]  K. Knorr-Cetina The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1985 .

[29]  P. Thagard,et al.  Computational Philosophy of Science , 1988 .

[30]  A.Rupert Hall The Selected Correspondence of Michael Faraday , 1972 .

[31]  Ryan D. Tweney,et al.  Psychology of science: A framework for the cognitive psychology of science , 1989 .

[32]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks , 1974 .

[33]  Michael E. Gorman,et al.  Understanding Invention as a Cognitive Process: The Case of Thomas Edison and Early Motion Pictures, 1888-91 , 1990 .

[34]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[35]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[36]  Agnes Arber,et al.  The mind and the eye , 1954 .

[37]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .

[38]  Nancy J. Nersessian,et al.  Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories , 1984 .

[39]  P. Winch The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy , 1960 .

[40]  R. Tweney Faraday’s Discovery of Induction: A Cognitive Approach , 1985 .