Development of a bespoke human factors taxonomy for gliding accident analysis and its revelations about highly inexperienced UK glider pilots

Low-hours solo glider pilots have a high risk of accidents compared to more experienced pilots. Numerous taxonomies for causal accident analysis have been produced for powered aviation but none of these is suitable for gliding, so a new taxonomy was required. A human factors taxonomy specifically for glider operations was developed and used to analyse all UK gliding accidents from 2002 to 2006 for their overall causes as well as factors specific to low hours pilots. Fifty-nine categories of pilot-related accident causation emerged, which were formed into progressively larger categories until four overall human factors groups were arrived at: ‘judgement’; ‘handling’; ‘strategy’; ‘attention’. ‘Handling’ accounted for a significantly higher proportion of injuries than other categories. Inexperienced pilots had considerably more accidents in all categories except ‘strategy’. Approach control (path judgement, airbrake and speed handling) as well as landing flare misjudgement were chiefly responsible for the high accident rate in early solo glider pilots.

[1]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[2]  Don Harris,et al.  Accident rates for novice glider pilots vs. pilots with experience. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  J. Knottnerus,et al.  Real world research. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[5]  Nancy Rossiter,et al.  Essential Skills for Management Research , 2004 .

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[7]  Susan Pardee Baker,et al.  Crashes of Instructional Flights. Analysis of Cases and Remedial Approaches. , 1996 .

[8]  Michael G. Lenné,et al.  Characteristics of Non-Fatal General Aviation Crashes in Australia: Insights from Insurance Data , 2006 .

[9]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System : HFACS : final report. , 2000 .

[10]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A Human Error Analysis of General Aviation Controlled Flight Into Terrain Accidents Occurring Between 1990-1998 , 2003 .

[11]  A J Feggetter A method for investigating human factor aspects of aircraft accidents and incidents. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[12]  Albert Boquet,et al.  Human Error and General Aviation Accidents: A Comprehensive, Fine-Grained Analysis Using HFACS , 2005 .

[13]  D O'Hare,et al.  The ‘Wheel of Misfortune’: a taxonomic approach to human factors in accident investigation and analysis in aviation and other complex systems , 2000, Ergonomics.

[14]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.

[15]  K Gerbert,et al.  The causes of causes: determinants and background variables of human factor incidents and accidents. , 1986, Ergonomics.

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[17]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  Glider accidents: an analysis of 143 cases, 2001-2005. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[18]  David O'Hare,et al.  Cognitive failure analysis for aircraft accident investigation , 1994 .

[19]  Joseph C. Hickox,et al.  COMPARISON OF EXPERT AND NOVICE SCAN BEHAVIORS DURING VFR FLIGHT , 2001 .

[20]  Douglas A. Wiegmann,et al.  APPLYING THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ( HFACS ) TO THE ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION ACCIDENT DATA , 2001 .

[21]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method , 1998 .

[22]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System : HFACS : final report. , 2000 .

[23]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .