Team dynamics feedback for post-secondary student learning teams

Abstract In the current research, we introduce the team CARE model for supporting team development during post-secondary education. Team CARE is part of a larger suite of assessments at itpmetrics.com. Team CARE is a free, online, survey-based assessment that allows team members to rate their team’s health and functioning in four key categories (communicate, adapt, relate and educate), as well as provide written feedback about the team’s functioning to add nuance and supplemental context to the numeric scores. Team members completing the assessment receive a report documenting their team’s scores on the variables measured. We report on data from student learning teams suggesting that the variables in the team CARE model are reliable, and that they are correlated with team performance outcomes. Students’ perceptions of the tool were also examined, and the findings suggest that team CARE is perceived to be valuable, useful and easy to use. Recommendations for practice are detailed, including sample assessment schedules for teams with differing life spans. Implications for future research and implementation are discussed.

[1]  Bridgette Sullivan-Taylor,et al.  Management Learning and the Corporate MBA: Situated or Individual? , 2007 .

[2]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring the Dynamics of Team Cohesion: Methods, Emerging Tools, and Advanced Technologies , 2015 .

[3]  E. Salas,et al.  How to turn a team of experts into an expert medical team: guidance from the aviation and military communities , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[4]  M. Robles Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace , 2012 .

[5]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Teamwork in planning innovative projects: improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process , 1990 .

[6]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[7]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team coordination dynamics. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[8]  Stéphane Brutus,et al.  Can Business Students Learn to Evaluate Better? Evidence From Repeated Exposure to a Peer-Evaluation System , 2013 .

[9]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Conflict in Small Groups: The Meaning and Consequences of Process Conflict , 2011 .

[10]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[11]  G. Velan,et al.  eMed Teamwork: a self-moderating system to gather peer feedback for developing and assessing teamwork skills , 2008, Medical teacher.

[12]  Helen E. Higson,et al.  Graduate Employability, 'Soft Skills' Versus 'Hard' Business Knowledge: A European Study , 2008 .

[13]  Rico Baldegger,et al.  A Global Classroom? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Collaboration as a Teaching Tool in Management Education , 2013 .

[14]  Thomas A. O'Neill,et al.  Examining the “Pros” and “Cons” of Team Conflict: A Team-Level Meta-Analysis of Task, Relationship, and Process Conflict , 2013 .

[15]  C. Gersick Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[16]  Norman Rudhumbu,et al.  Educational Measurement and Evaluation , 2016 .

[17]  D. Tjosvold Cooperative and competitive goal approach to conflict: Accomplishments and challenges. , 1998 .

[18]  Natalie Simper,et al.  Assessing teamwork in undergraduate education: a measurement tool to evaluate individual teamwork skills , 2017 .

[19]  Robert W. Brennan,et al.  Constructive Controversy and Reflexivity Training Promotes Effective Conflict Profiles and Team Functioning in Student Learning Teams , 2017 .

[20]  Jum C. Nunnally,et al.  Educational measurement and evaluation , 1972 .

[21]  N. Gillespie,et al.  Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[23]  Dana E. Sims,et al.  Is there a “Big Five” in Teamwork? , 2005 .

[24]  Mien Segers,et al.  Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review , 2012 .

[25]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[26]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for Self and Peer Evaluation , 2012 .

[27]  D. Tjosvold Constructive controversy for management education : developing committed, open-minded researchers , 2008 .

[28]  Thomas A. O’Neill,et al.  "Peer Feedback Increases Team Member Performance, Confidence and Work Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study" , 2015 .

[29]  Michelle C. Bligh,et al.  Leadership and Trust , 2017 .

[30]  K. Jehn A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[31]  Peter Navarro,et al.  The MBA Core Curricula of Top-Ranked U.S. Business Schools: A Study in Failure? , 2008 .

[32]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Leon Mann,et al.  Leadership and trust: Their effect on knowledge sharing and team performance , 2010 .

[34]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[35]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Developing the Future Workforce: An Approach for Integrating Interpersonal Skills Into the MBA Classroom , 2014 .

[36]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  Innovation in an Academic Setting: Designing and Leading a Business Through Market Focused, Interdisciplinary Teams ARTHUR A. BONI , 2009 .

[37]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[38]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Helping teams to help themselves: : comparing two team-led debriefing methods , 2013 .

[39]  Matthew J. W. McLarnon,et al.  The Structure and Function of Team Conflict State Profiles , 2018 .

[40]  N. Bozionelos,et al.  Team Exploratory and Exploitative Learning: Psychological Safety, Task Conflict, and Team Performance , 2011 .

[41]  Gregory E. Prussia,et al.  A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. , 1996 .

[42]  Thomas A. O'Neill,et al.  The Trajectory of Emergence of Shared Group-Level Constructs , 2015 .

[43]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .