Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: solvent permeation results and modeling

Abstract Membrane processes like reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) can be low energy consuming operations as compared to the traditional chemical engineering unit operations and have been widely used for aqueous systems. Since such membrane processes are low energy consuming operations, their use in non-aqueous systems would offer considerable energy savings. Thus, the study is directed towards development and experimental verification of membrane materials and transport models to explain permeation properties of non-aqueous solvent systems. The understanding of polymer–solvent interactions is critical towards the development of suitable materials and also the prediction of the transport mechanisms. Pure solvent permeation studies were conducted to understand the mechanism of solvent transport through polymeric membranes. Different membrane materials (hydrophilic and hydrophobic) as well as different solvents (polar and non-polar) were used for the study. Pure solvent fluxes for hydrophilic membranes used showed that polar solvents (methanol, ethanol, iso -propanol) had a significantly higher flux (8–10 times) than that of the non-polar solvents (pentane, hexane, octane). On the contrary, the non-polar solvent flux was two to four times that of the polar solvents for hydrophobic membranes. For example, hexane flux at ∼13 bar through a hydrophobic silicone based NF membrane was ∼0.6×10 −4  cm 3 /cm 2  s. And that through a hydrophilic aromatic polyamide based NF membrane was ∼6×10 −4  cm 3 /cm 2  s. A simple model based on a solution-diffusion approach is proposed for predicting the pure solvent permeation through hydrophobic polymeric membranes. The model uses molar volume and viscosity of the solvent as parameters for predicting the pure solvent permeability. The model reasonably predicts the pure solvent permeation ( R 2 =0.89, S.E.∼4%) for hydrophobic membranes. The model has also been experimentally verified using high solution temperatures and also literature experimental data. To extend the predictions to different membranes (hydrophilic and hydrophobic), surface energy and sorption values have been used as a parameter along with the solvent physical properties.

[1]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes: Part II. Transport model , 2000 .

[2]  Nandakishore Rajagopalan,et al.  Deacidification of soybean oil by membrane technology , 1996 .

[3]  Mitsutoshi Nakajima,et al.  Membrane concentration and separation of L-aspartic acid and L-phenylalanine derivatives in organic solvents , 1996 .

[4]  R. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Comparison of the Separation of Mixtures by Vapor Permeation and by Pervaporation Using PVA Composite Membranes. I. Binary Alcohol-Water Systems , 1992 .

[5]  David Hasson,et al.  Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I: investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux , 1999 .

[6]  Matthias Schmidt,et al.  Nanofiltrationsmembranen für Trennprobleme in organischen Lösungen , 1999 .

[7]  T. Aminabhavi,et al.  Sorption, Desorption, Diffusion, and Permeation of Aliphatic Alkanes into Santoprene Thermoplastic Rubber , 1995 .

[8]  D. R. Paul.  The Solution-Diffusion Model for Swollen Membranes , 1976 .

[9]  M. D. Pinho,et al.  Membrane surface characterisation by contact angle measurements using the immersed method , 1997 .

[10]  Allan F. M. Barton,et al.  CRC Handbook of solubility parameters and other cohesion parameters , 1983 .

[11]  Je Young Kim,et al.  Liquid-liquid phase separation in polysulfone/solvent/water systems , 1997 .

[12]  T. Aminabhavi,et al.  Diffusion and sorption of organic liquids through polymer membranes: 10. Polyurethane, nitrile-butadiene rubber and epichlorohydrin versus aliphatic alcohols (C1-C5) , 1993 .

[13]  E. Lusas,et al.  Membrane processing of crude vegetable oils: Pilot plant scale remoyal of solvent from oil miscellas , 1990 .

[14]  D. Viswanath,et al.  Data book on the viscosity of liquids , 1989 .

[15]  A. Iwama,et al.  New polyimide ultrafiltration membranes for organic use , 1982 .

[16]  B A Farnand,et al.  Reverse osmosis separations of some organic and inorganic solutes in ethanol solutions with cellulose acetate membranes , 1983 .

[17]  Kamalesh K. Sirkar,et al.  Modeling of nanofiltration - assisted organic synthesis , 1999 .

[18]  H. Ohya,et al.  Reverse osmotic concentration of aqueous 2-butanone (methyl ethyl ketone), tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate solutions. , 1988 .

[19]  É. Favre,et al.  Clustering of solvents in membranes and its influence on membrane transport properties , 1996 .

[20]  D. R. Paul,et al.  Driving force for hydraulic and pervaporative transport in homogeneous membranes , 1975 .

[21]  R. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Sorption isotherms of alcohols in zeolite-filled silicone rubber and in PVA-composite membranes , 1992 .

[22]  M. Laatikainen,et al.  Measurement of sorption in polymer membranes with a quartz crystal microbalance , 1986 .

[23]  D. R. Paul,et al.  The mechanism of liquid transport through swollen polymer membranes , 1971 .

[24]  Sorption and longitudinal swelling kinetic behaviour in the system cellulose acetate-methanol , 1997 .

[25]  S. Sourirajan.  Separation of Hydrocarbon Liquids by Flow Under Pressure Through Porous Membranes , 1964, Nature.

[26]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation , 1999 .

[27]  P. Schaetzel,et al.  Sorption of organic solvents into dense silicone membranes. Part 1.—Validity and limitations of Flory–Huggins and related theories , 1993 .

[28]  G. Unnikrishnan,et al.  Sorption and diffusion of aliphatic hydrocarbons into crosslinked natural rubber , 1997 .

[29]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[30]  P. Schaetzel,et al.  Sorption of organic solvents into dense silicone membranes. Part 2.—Development of a new approach based on a clustering hypothesis for associated solvents , 1993 .

[31]  W. Gill,et al.  REVIEW OF REVERSE OSMOSIS MEMBRANES AND TRANSPORT MODELS , 1981 .

[32]  D. R. Paul,et al.  Hydraulic permeation of liquids through swollen polymeric networks. II. Liquid mixtures , 1975 .

[33]  Yingcai Long,et al.  Investigation of poly(dimethyl siloxane) (PDMS)–solvent interactions by DSC , 2000 .

[34]  J. Kopeček.  Performance of Porous Cellulose Acetate Membranes for the Reverse Osmosis Separation of Mixtures of Organic Liquids , 1970 .

[35]  Kamalesh K. Sirkar,et al.  Nanofiltration studies of larger organic microsolutes in methanol solutions , 2000 .

[36]  J. L. Duda,et al.  Diffusion and Equilibrium Measurements in Ternary Polymer−Solvent−Solvent Systems Using Inverse Gas Chromatography , 1998 .

[37]  R. Lichtenthaler,et al.  Sorption equilibria and diffusion in polymeric membranes , 1989 .

[38]  Munir Cheryan,et al.  Solvent recovery and partial deacidification of vegetable oils by membrane technology , 1996 .

[39]  M. S. High,et al.  Handbook of Polymer Solution Thermodynamics: Danner/Handbook , 1993 .

[40]  R. L. Riley,et al.  Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes , 1965 .