Magnetic Resonance Discography in Cadavers: Tears of the Annulus Fibrosus

The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance discography in the detection of tears of the annulus fibrosus, and to compare the findings with those derived from conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-four intervertebral discs from cadavers were examined with magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance discography, and anatomic correlation was done. Forty-six annular tears were documented on anatomic inspection of the specimens. Magnetic resonance discography allowed significantly better observation of radial than transverse annular tears, and identification of radial tears was significantly better than that of concentric tears. With magnetic resonance discography, detectability of concentric tears was not significantly better than that of the transverse tears. No significant differences in the detection of different types of annular tears were appreciated on the magnetic resonance images obtained before discography. Magnetic resonance discography allowed direct diagnosis of radial, transverse, and concentric tears in 100%, 57%, and 21% of specimens, respectively. With magnetic resonance imaging, the diagnosis of radial, transverse, and concentric tears was possible in 67%, 71%, and 21% of specimens, respectively. Magnetic resonance discography does well in the evaluation of the clinically important radial tears of the annulus fibrosus, although not uniformly well in the identification of other types of annular tears.

[1]  P. Renton,et al.  The Value of Lumbar Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Demonstration of Anular Tears , 1998, Spine.

[2]  J. Simmons,et al.  The Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc: The High‐Intensity Zone With Discography Correlation , 1996, Spine.

[3]  K. Schellhas,et al.  Lumbar Disc High‐intensity Zone: Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Discography , 1996, Spine.

[4]  B. Vernon‐roberts,et al.  Annular tears and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. A post-mortem study of 135 discs. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  M. Modic,et al.  Current assessment of spinal degenerative disease with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  N. Bogduk,et al.  High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  R. Fraser,et al.  MRI and discography of annular tears and intervertebral disc degeneration. A prospective clinical comparison. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  P. Ruggieri,et al.  Imaging modalities for evaluation of the spine. , 1991, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[9]  M. Zlatkin,et al.  Normal and degenerated intervertebral disk: in vivo and in vitro MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  V. Haughton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and anatomy of the spine. , 1991, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[11]  M. Modic,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of low back pain. , 1991, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[12]  M. Kornberg.  Discography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Disc Disruption , 1989, Spine.

[13]  V M Haughton,et al.  Comparison of MR and diskography in detecting radial tears of the anulus: a postmortem study. , 1989, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Lumbar discography--where are we today? , 1989, Spine.

[15]  J. Jinkins,et al.  The anatomic basis of vertebrogenic pain and the autonomic syndrome associated with lumbar disk extrusion. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  V. Haughton,et al.  Criteria for classifying normal and degenerated lumbar intervertebral disks. , 1989, Radiology.

[17]  T. Yasuma,et al.  False-negative lumbar discograms. Correlation of discographic and histological findings in postmortem and surgical specimens. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  M. Modic,et al.  Imaging of degenerative disk disease. , 1988, Radiology.

[19]  J. Hesselink,et al.  Spine imaging: history, achievements, remaining frontiers. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  V. Haughton,et al.  Tears of the anulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. , 1988, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  P. Hudkins,et al.  The Inflammatory Effect of Nucleus Pulposus: A Possible Element in the Pathogenesis of Low-back Pain , 1987, Spine.

[22]  V. Haughton,et al.  Lumbar intervertebral disk: correlative MR and anatomic study. , 1985, Radiology.

[23]  M. Modic,et al.  The intranuclear cleft of the intervertebral disk: magnetic resonance imaging. , 1985, Radiology.

[24]  M. Osteaux,et al.  Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. , 1998, Radiology.

[25]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Discography 2000. , 1998, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[26]  M. Modic,et al.  Controversy: Lumbar discography , 1996 .

[27]  M. Pope,et al.  Spinal biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  T J Masaryk,et al.  Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[29]  V. Haughton,et al.  Progressive and regressive changes in the nucleus pulposus. Part II. The adult. , 1988, Radiology.

[30]  David S. Bradford,et al.  Moe's textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities , 1987 .

[31]  W. Hutton,et al.  The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  R. Schülke.  [Anatomy and physiology]. , 1968, Zahntechnik; Zeitschrift fur Theorie und Praxis der wissenschaftlichen Zahntechnik.