Abstract Consider a two period exchange economy with dividend uncertainty. Agents have different beliefs, endowments and utility functions. This results in different motives for trading, such as risk-sharing and speculation. In the first period agents trade Arrow securities in zero supply. The set of available Arrow securities is of a specific form, but it can be complete or incomplete. In the second period one out of many possible states of nature is realized. I show that agents with more accurate beliefs (in the sense of higher market entropy) will accumulate more wealth and therefore dominate the economy. This holds regardless of agents’ preferences over risk and in both complete and incomplete market economies. These results indicate that belief accuracy rather than preferences over risk is the critical factor determining survival. However, the exact sense in which agents with more accurate beliefs become wealthier is stronger in complete market economies than in incomplete market economies.
[1]
Alvaro Sandroni.
Do markets favor agents able to make accurate predictions
,
2000
.
[2]
A. Alchian.
Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory
,
1950,
Journal of Political Economy.
[3]
Frédéric Palomino,et al.
Noise trading in small markets
,
1994
.
[4]
Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.
Essays in Positive Economics.
,
1954
.
[5]
L. Blume,et al.
Evolution and market behavior
,
1992
.
[6]
L. Summers,et al.
Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets
,
1990,
Journal of Political Economy.
[7]
L. Blume,et al.
If You're so Smart, Why Aren't You Rich? Belief Selection in Complete and Incomplete Markets
,
2001
.
[8]
L. Summers,et al.
The Survival of Noise Traders in Financial Markets
,
1988
.
[9]
L. Summers,et al.
The Noise Trader Approach to Finance
,
1990
.
[10]
Andrei Shleifer,et al.
The Size and Incidence of the Losses from Noise Trading
,
1989
.