Design Management from a Contractor's Perspective: The Need for Clarity

Abstract Over the past 40 years, a concern with the adoption of business methods to support successful design development has emerged. Design management as a discipline addresses such concern through two central schools of thought. The first focuses on organizing the design firm, and the second aims to better understand the design process (its nature, stages and activities) and to propose improved communication and coordination mechanisms. Both schools of thought have taken essentially a design professional's perspective to analyse design. Nevertheless, the recent adoption of procurement routes in which contractors are responsible for design, construction and facilities management has imposed on contractors the need to manage design to maintain competitiveness. This paper presents results from two case studies investigating the contractor's role in managing the design process. Research results are presented in terms of the problems contractors face in managing design, the necessity for appropriate design management and the skills contractors believe are required for effective design management. The paper concludes by advocating a need for clarity in the definition of design management from a contractor's perspective.

[1]  Sarah Curtis,et al.  Therapy by design: evaluating the UK hospital building program. , 2004, Health & place.

[2]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Observations of teamwork and social processes in design , 1995 .

[3]  G. Dromart,et al.  A Model , 2009 .

[4]  Jane Broadbent,et al.  Public Private Partnerships: An Introduction , 2003, Making Policy Happen.

[5]  Patricia Tzortzopoulos,et al.  The design and implementation of product development process models in construction companies , 2004 .

[6]  Charles J. Fornaciari,et al.  Slack resources and firm performance: a meta-analysis☆ , 2004 .

[7]  Renata Liedtke,et al.  A model for managing the product development process in house building , 2002 .

[8]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The Design Experience: The Role of Design and Designers in the Twenty-First Century , 2003 .

[9]  David Silverman,et al.  Qualitative research: meanings or practices? , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[10]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[11]  C. Lackman,et al.  Organizational learning: a critical component to new product development , 2000 .

[12]  Christine Pasquire,et al.  Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction , 2007 .

[13]  Baden Hellard Boobyer Brunton.  Management applied to architectural practice , 1964 .

[14]  Rizal Sebastian.  CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF DESIGN MANAGEMENT IN ARCHITECTURE , 2004 .

[15]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Intentions, practices and aspirations: Understanding learning in design , 2003 .

[16]  K. Krippendorff.  Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[17]  Peter Barrett,et al.  Better Construction Briefing , 1999 .

[18]  Rachel Cooper,et al.  The Design Agenda: A Guide to Successful Design Management , 1995 .

[19]  Tim Cornick.  Quality management for building design , 1991 .

[20]  Donald G. Reinertsen.  Managing The Design Factory: A Product Developer's Toolkit , 1997 .

[21]  Brigitte Borja de Mozota,et al.  Design Management: Using Design to Build Brand Value and Corporate Innovation , 2003 .

[22]  A. Akintoye.  Design and build: a survey of construction contractors’ views , 1994 .

[23]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  The Design and Implementation of FFTW3 , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[24]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Natural intelligence in design , 1999 .

[25]  Graham Winch,et al.  Processes, maps and protocols: Understanding the shape of the construction process , 2001 .

[26]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  On the Agenda of Design Management Research , 1998 .

[27]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[28]  Rizal Sebastian,et al.  The Interface Between Design and Management , 2005, Design Issues.