Modification of mechanical properties and resolution of printed stereolithographic objects through RAFT agent incorporation

Abstract Stereolithography (SL) is an additive manufacturing technique that uses light to cure liquid resins into thin layers and fabricate 3-dimensional objects layer by layer. SL is of high interest for small-volume manufacturing and rapid prototyping because of its ability to relatively quickly create objects with intricate 100 μm or smaller features. However, widespread adoption of SL faces a number of obstacles including unsuitable thermomechanical properties, anisotropic properties, and limited resolution and fidelity. In this work, we incorporate a reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent into a glassy acrylate formulation to modify mechanical properties and improve resolution of objects printed using digital light processing (DLP) SL. Incorporating a small amount of a trithiocarbonate RAFT agent into the formulation leads to increased elongation and toughness accompanied by a small decrease in tensile modulus. To determine anisotropic properties of DLP SL, samples were printed in “horizontal” or “vertical” directions, where the long axis of the sample was printed in the x-axis or z-axis, respectively. RAFT samples printed in a vertical orientation exhibit a higher modulus than non-RAFT controls prior to post-cure in addition to a similar modulus with increased toughness upon UV post-cure due to the living/controlled nature of RAFT polymerization. Furthermore, incorporating a RAFT agent into the formulation allows significantly higher fidelity printing of a broad range of positive and negative features as small as 100 μm. The RAFT formulation allows objects to be printed with significantly better fidelity than non-RAFT formulations, even when a radical scavenger is incorporated to mimic reaction rates observed from the RAFT formulation. Additionally, the RAFT agent significantly increases the critical energy parameter determined from the SL working curve, indicating an increase in gel point conversion. This work demonstrates the benefits of using controlled/living polymerization in a highly cross-linked acrylate system to improve toughness, modify anisotropic properties, and print high-fidelity features with enhanced properties in 3D printed materials.

[1]  J. Stansbury,et al.  Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and strain in dental resins and composites. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  Gordon K. Hamer,et al.  Narrow molecular weight resins by a free-radical polymerization process , 1993 .

[3]  Graeme Moad,et al.  Radical addition-fragmentation chemistry in polymer synthesis , 2008 .

[4]  M. Zabti Effects of light absorber on micro stereolithography parts , 2012 .

[5]  Gabriel Popescu,et al.  High‐Resolution Projection Microstereolithography for Patterning of Neovasculature , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[6]  C. Bowman,et al.  Novel dental restorative materials having low polymerization shrinkage stress via stress relaxation by addition-fragmentation chain transfer. , 2012, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  R. Liska,et al.  Exploring the benefits of β-allyl sulfones for more homogeneous dimethacrylate photopolymer networks , 2015 .

[8]  Maarten Danial,et al.  Ultrafast RAFT polymerization: multiblock copolymers within minutes , 2015 .

[9]  S. Moradian,et al.  Manipulating the Surface Structure of Hybrid UV Curable Coatings through Photopolymerization‐Induced Phase Separation: Influence of Inorganic Portion and Photoinitiator Content , 2018 .

[10]  Aleksandr Ovsianikov,et al.  Laser 3D Printing with Sub‐Microscale Resolution of Porous Elastomeric Scaffolds for Supporting Human Bone Stem Cells , 2015, Advanced healthcare materials.

[11]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[12]  C. Bowman,et al.  Kinetic gelation predictions of species aggregation in tetrafunctional monomer polymerizations , 1995 .

[13]  C. Bowman,et al.  Probing the origins and control of shrinkage stress in dental resin composites. II. Novel method of simultaneous measurement of polymerization shrinkage stress and conversion. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[14]  Craig J. Hawker,et al.  Molecular Weight Control by a "Living" Free-Radical Polymerization Process , 1994 .

[15]  Elsa Reichmanis,et al.  Photopolymer Materials and Processes for Advanced Technologies , 2014 .

[16]  Y. Yagcı,et al.  Addition-fragmentation reactions in polymer chemistry , 1999 .

[17]  C. Guymon,et al.  Effects of directed architecture in epoxy functionalized prepolymers for photocurable thin films , 2017 .

[18]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Kinetic evidence of reaction diffusion during the polymerization of multi(meth)acrylate monomers , 1994 .

[19]  F. Melchels,et al.  A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[20]  C. Bowman,et al.  Reducing Shrinkage Stress of Dimethacrylate Networks by Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer , 2012 .

[21]  Nicholas X. Fang,et al.  Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask , 2005 .

[22]  Jieqiong Lin,et al.  A review on the processing accuracy of two-photon polymerization , 2015 .

[23]  C. H. Ahrens,et al.  Evaluation of post-curing and laser manufacturing parameters on the properties of SOMOS 7110 photosensitive resin used in stereolithography , 2009 .

[24]  Janice M. Dulieu-Barton,et al.  Mechanical Properties of a Typical Stereolithography Resin , 2000 .

[25]  J. Stampfl,et al.  Rapid formation of regulated methacrylate networks yielding tough materials for lithography-based 3D printing , 2016 .

[26]  Paul F. Jacobs,et al.  Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography , 1992 .

[27]  E. Stone,et al.  Effect of Molecular Weight and Functionality on Acrylated Poly(caprolactone) for Stereolithography and Biomedical Applications. , 2018, Biomacromolecules.

[28]  Christopher Barner-Kowollik,et al.  The future of reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization , 2008 .

[29]  R. Liska,et al.  Toughening of photo-curable polymer networks: a review , 2016 .

[30]  I. Zein,et al.  Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[31]  Patri K. Venuvinod Rapid prototyping , 2003 .

[32]  Sébastien Perrier,et al.  Macromolecular design via réversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT)/Xanthates (MADIX) polymerization , 2005 .

[33]  P. Chaumont,et al.  Chain Transfer by the Addition-Fragmentation Mechanism. 6.1 Radical Polymerization toward the Synthesis of End-Functional Telomers, Macroinitiators, and Block Copolymers , 1996 .

[34]  J. Chiefari,et al.  Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition - Fragmentation chain transfer: The RAFT process , 1998 .

[35]  R. Mülhaupt,et al.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing , 2017, Chemical reviews.