Helping a Man with Multiple Disabilities to Use Single vs Repeated Performance of Simple Motor Schemes as Different Responses

A man with multiple disabilities was taught to use single vs repeated performance of simple motor schemes as different responses. Specifically, single and double emissions of a finger movement served as two separate responses, which allowed direct access to different environmental stimuli via microswitch technology. Single and double emissions of a head movement served as two additional responses, which allowed interaction with two different caregivers who were called via voice output communication aids (VOCAs). The results showed that the man, who had pervasive motor impairment, acquired the four responses available and seemed to use them purposefully. The implications of this approach to increase the response options of persons with few controllable motor schemes were discussed.

[1]  Mark F O'Reilly,et al.  Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. , 2005, Research in developmental disabilities.

[2]  G E Lancioni,et al.  Micro-switch programmes for students with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour: Assessing response acquisition and choice , 2006, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Brief report: Fostering environmental control in a young child with rett syndrome: A case study , 1995, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[4]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  A Social Validation Assessment of Microswitch-Based Programs for Persons with Multiple Disabilities Employing Teacher Trainees and Parents as Raters , 2006 .

[5]  Raymond G. Miltenberger,et al.  Behavior modification: Principles and procedures, 2nd ed. , 2001 .

[6]  Giulio E. Lancioni,et al.  Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation , 2005, Cognitive Processing.

[7]  Linda C. Mechling,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Three Approaches on the Frequency of Stimulus Activations, via a Single Switch, by Students With Profound Intellectual Disabilities , 2006 .

[8]  John W. Schuster,et al.  Using microswitches to teach toy use , 1993 .

[9]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: new research evaluation and social validation. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[10]  P. Vietze,et al.  Computer‐assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities , 2004 .

[11]  A. Vanbiervliet,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Fostering Environmental Control in a Young Child with Rett Syndrome: A Case Study. , 1994 .

[13]  A. E. Kazlxn,et al.  Behavior Modification in Applied Settings , 1975 .

[14]  Ching-Tien Shih,et al.  A new movement detector to enable people with multiple disabilities to control environmental stimulation with hand swing through a commercial mouse. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[15]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Microswitch-Based Programs for Persons with Multiple Disabilities: An Overview of Some Recent Developments , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  R. Miltenberger Behavior Modification: Principles and Procedures , 1996 .

[17]  C. Vlaskamp,et al.  Domains of quality of life of people with profound multiple disabilities : The perspective of parents and direct support staff , 2005 .

[18]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Promoting Engagement, Requests and Choice by a Man with Post-Coma Pervasive Motor Impairment and Minimally Conscious State through a Technology-Based Program , 2008 .

[19]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Behavior modification in applied settings, 6th ed. , 1989 .