Evaluating the Differences in Modeling Biophysical Attributes between Deciduous Broadleaved and Evergreen Conifer Forests Using Low-Density Small-Footprint LiDAR Data

Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has been used for forest biomass estimation for the past three decades. The performance of estimation, in particular, has been of great interest. However, the difference in the performance of estimation between stem volume (SV) and total dry biomass (TDB) estimations has been a priority topic. We compared the performances between SV and TDB estimations for evergreen conifer and deciduous broadleaved forests by correlation and regression analyses and by combining height and no-height variables to identify statistically useful variables. Thirty-eight canopy variables, such as average and standard deviation of the canopy height, as well as the mid-canopy height of the stands, were computed using LiDAR point data. For the case of conifer forests, TDB showed greater correlation than SV; however, the opposite was the case for deciduous broadleaved forests. The average- and mid-canopy height showed the greatest correlation with TDB and SV for conifer and deciduous broadleaved forests, respectively. Setting the best variable as the first and no-height variables as the second variable, a stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed. Predictions by selected equations slightly underestimated the field data used for validation, and their correlation was very high, exceeding 0.9 for coniferous forests. The coefficient of determination of the two-variable equations was smaller than that of the one-variable equation for broadleaved forests. It is suggested that canopy structure variables were not effective for broadleaved forests. The SV and TDB maps showed quite different frequency distributions. The ratio of the stem part of the broadleaved forest is smaller than that of the coniferous forest. This suggests that SV was relatively smaller than TDB for the case of broadleaved forests compared with coniferous forests, resulting in a more even spatial distribution of TDB than that of SV.

[1]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[2]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests , 1999 .

[3]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Estimating individual tree heights of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[4]  P. Gong,et al.  Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data , 2007, Journal of Forest Research.

[5]  Shogo Kato,et al.  Common Allometric Relationships for Estimating Tree Biomasses in Cool Temperate Forests of Japan. , 2011 .

[6]  E. Næsset Area-Based Inventory in Norway – From Innovation to an Operational Reality , 2014 .

[7]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Predicting individual stem volumes of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[8]  Connie Ko,et al.  Hybrid Ensemble Classification of Tree Genera Using Airborne LiDAR Data , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[9]  E. Næsset Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[10]  R. McRoberts,et al.  Empirical coverage of model-based variance estimators for remote sensing assisted estimation of stand-level timber volume , 2016, Remote sensing of environment.

[11]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[12]  Toshiharu Kojima,et al.  Classification of forest vegetation types using LiDAR data and Quickbird images:- Case study of the Daihachiga River Basin in Takayama city - , 2012 .

[13]  S. Popescu,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of forest biomass : A scale-invariant estimation approach using airborne lasers , 2009 .

[14]  Tatsuo Sweda,et al.  Long-range Estimation of Standing Timber Stock in Western Boreal Forest of Canada Using Airborne Laser Altimetry. , 2006 .

[15]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[16]  Wenjian Ni,et al.  Forest stand biomass estimation using ALOS PALSAR data based on LiDAR-derived prior knowledge in the Qilian Mountain, western China , 2012 .

[17]  Erik Næsset,et al.  Effects of different flying altitudes on biophysical stand properties estimated from canopy height and density measured with a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[18]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Biomass Assessment , 2012 .

[19]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Modeling Stand Height, Volume, and Biomass from Very High Spatial Resolution Satellite Imagery and Samples of Airborne LiDAR , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Using Small-Footprint Discrete and Full-Waveform Airborne LiDAR Metrics to Estimate Total Biomass and Biomass Components in Subtropical Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data , 2007 .

[22]  W. Cohen,et al.  Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA , 1999 .

[23]  S. Roberts,et al.  Influence of Fusing Lidar and Multispectral Imagery on Remotely Sensed Estimates of Stand Density and Mean Tree Height in a Managed Loblolly Pine Plantation , 2003, Forest Science.

[24]  K. Lim,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of biophysical properties of tolerant northern hardwood forests , 2003 .

[25]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Estimating forest growth using canopy metrics derived from airborne laser scanner data , 2005 .

[26]  P. West,et al.  Tree and Forest Measurement , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[28]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Retrieval of Forest Aboveground Biomass and Stem Volume with Airborne Scanning LiDAR , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[29]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[30]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2003, Forest Science.

[31]  Ross Nelson,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and volume using airborne laser data , 1988 .

[32]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Measuring forest structure and biomass in New England forest stands using Echidna ground-based lidar , 2011 .