Automatic breathing segmentation from wearable respiration sensors

Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography (RIP) allows studying the physiology of the breathing process and provides ability to characterize it in an automated manner. An efficient and robust automatic breath segmentation technique that can be applied to sensor signals acquired in free living conditions is of interest due to the significant variability in the breathing patterns of different activities. The gold standard for breath segmentation has been visual recognition of breath cycles based on respiratory signals interpreted by an expert. This process is impractical for long term monitoring of respiration, especially when intended to be performed by wearable sensors. In this work a feasibility study is presented using a technique for automatic breath segmentation based on peak and valley detection to determine beginning and end of a breath segment. The proposed segmentation method is applied to breathing recordings collected from four different activities: resting, reading aloud, food intake and smoking, acquired by a wearable RIP sensor. Significant differences in the breathing waveforms patterns are easily observed for each one of these activities. Results suggest that the breath segmentation technique studied in this paper has enough robustness to be used under different activities, with up to 96.6% accuracy for resting, 89.9% for reading, 91.1% for food intake and 89.2% for smoking.

[1]  M J English,et al.  Accurate segmentation of respiration waveforms from infants enabling identification and classification of irregular breathing patterns. , 1994, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Frank H Wilhelm,et al.  Reliability of respiratory tidal volume estimation by means of ambulatory inductive plethysmography. , 2006, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[3]  P. Sleight,et al.  Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  G. Benchetrit Breathing pattern in humans: diversity and individuality. , 2000, Respiration physiology.

[5]  J. Fleetham,et al.  Cigarette smoke inhalation patterns and bronchial reactivity. , 1988, Thorax.

[6]  R A Jones Cigarettes, respiratory rate, and the relaxation paradox. , 1987, The International journal of the addictions.

[7]  M A Sackner,et al.  Subjective and objective measurement of cigarette smoke inhalation. , 1982, Chest.

[8]  A. Winkworth,et al.  Breathing patterns during spontaneous speech. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  T. P. Moyles,et al.  A nonparametric statistical approach to breath segmentation , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[10]  Pierre Baconnier,et al.  Respiratory inductive plethysmography to assess respiratory variability and complexity in humans , 2007, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[11]  Koichiro Matsuo,et al.  Respiration during feeding on solid food: alterations in breathing during mastication, pharyngeal bolus aggregation, and swallowing. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  A. Winkworth,et al.  Variability and consistency in speech breathing during reading: lung volumes, speech intensity, and linguistic factors. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  David L. Olson,et al.  Advanced Data Mining Techniques , 2008 .

[14]  Robert E Kearney,et al.  Automated respiratory inductive plethysmography to evaluate breathing in infants at risk for postoperative apnea , 2008, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[15]  G Schmalisch,et al.  Comparative investigations of algorithms for the detection of breaths in newborns with disturbed respiratory signals. , 1998, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[16]  Ethem Alpaydin,et al.  Introduction to machine learning , 2004, Adaptive computation and machine learning.