Number processing induces spatial performance biases

Background: Response speed in parity judgments is faster with the left hand for small numbers (e.g., 1 or 2) and faster with the right hand for larger numbers (e.g., 8 or 9). This effect suggests that number processing can induce systematic spatial biases in bisection tasks. Method: Neurologically healthy participants bisected visually presented stimuli with a pencil. Stimuli were long strings of uniform digits (experiment 1) or lines with single digit flankers (experiment 2). Results: Bisection performance was biased to the left of center for strings made of digits 1 or 2 and to the right of center for strings made of digits 8 or 9. Line bisection was biased toward the flanker representing the larger magnitude, regardless of its position. Conclusions: These results extend previous findings and support the notion of an automatic association of number magnitudes with spatial response codes. The effect may be useful for an assessment of semantic number processing in special populations.

[1]  D. Berch,et al.  Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  J W Aldridge,et al.  Memory representation of alphabetic position and interval information. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[4]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: An analysis of line bisection , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  S Dehaene,et al.  A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  M. Luckiesh Visual Illusions: their Causes, Characteristics, and Applications , 1923, Nature.

[8]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[9]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  W. Fias The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect , 1996 .

[11]  T K LANDAUER,et al.  Rate of Implicit Speech , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[13]  M. Fischer Word Centre is Misperceived , 2000, Perception.

[14]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  The effect of cueing on unilateral neglect , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[16]  M. H. Fischer Bisection performance indicates spatial word representation. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Images of numbers, or “when 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue” , 1992, Cognition.

[18]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Less Attention and More Perception in Cued Line Bisection , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .