Concise Review: A High‐Content Screening Approach to Stem Cell Research and Drug Discovery

High‐throughput screening (HTS) is a technology widely used for early stages of drug discovery in pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Recent hardware and software improvements have enabled HTS to be used in combination with subcellular resolution microscopy, resulting in cell image‐based HTS, called high‐content screening (HCS). HCS allows the acquisition of deeper knowledge at a single‐cell level such that more complex biological systems can be studied in a high‐throughput manner. The technique is particularly well‐suited for stem cell research and drug discovery, which almost inevitably require single‐cell resolutions for the detection of rare phenotypes in heterogeneous cultures. With growing availability of facilities, instruments, and reagent libraries, small‐to‐moderate scale HCS can now be carried out in regular academic labs. We envision that the HCS technique will play an increasing role in both basic mechanism study and early‐stage drug discovery on stem cells. Here, we review the development of HCS technique and its past application on stem cells and discuss possible future developments. Stem Cells2012;30:1800–1807

[1]  Jonathan Low,et al.  Knockdown of Cancer Testis Antigens Modulates Neural Stem Cell Marker Expression in Glioblastoma Tumor Stem Cells , 2010, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[2]  James A. Thomson,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells from a spinal muscular atrophy patient , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitors of Neurite Loss Induced by Aβ peptide using High Content Screening* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Characterizing heterogeneous cellular responses to perturbations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G. Milligan,et al.  High-content screening of feeder-free human embryonic stem cells to identify pro-survival small molecules. , 2010, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  C. Chong,et al.  New uses for old drugs , 2007, Nature.

[7]  Tiago G Fernandes,et al.  Three‐dimensional cell culture microarray for high‐throughput studies of stem cell fate , 2010, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  N. D. Clarke,et al.  A genome-wide RNAi screen reveals determinants of human embryonic stem cell identity , 2010, Nature.

[9]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Image-based chemical screening identifies drug efflux inhibitors in lung cancer cells. , 2010, Cancer research.

[10]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Chemical Genetics , 1973, Nature.

[11]  R. Eglen,et al.  The use of immortalized cell lines in GPCR screening: the good, bad and ugly. , 2008, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[12]  Tiago G Fernandes,et al.  High-throughput cellular microarray platforms: applications in drug discovery, toxicology and stem cell research. , 2009, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  I. Weissman,et al.  Direct isolation of human central nervous system stem cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  D Lansing Taylor,et al.  Past, present, and future of high content screening and the field of cellomics. , 2007, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  Hynek Wichterle,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Generated from Patients with ALS Can Be Differentiated into Motor Neurons , 2008, Science.

[16]  C. Schaniel,et al.  Exploration of self-renewal and pluripotency in ES cells using RNAi. , 2010, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  A. Orth,et al.  Screening the mammalian extracellular proteome for regulators of embryonic human stem cell pluripotency , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Wolfgang Link,et al.  High content screening: seeing is believing. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[19]  A. Trounson,et al.  Genetic modification of human embryonic stem cells for derivation of target cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[20]  A. Viale,et al.  Modeling Pathogenesis and Treatment of Familial Dysautonomia using Patient Specific iPSCs , 2009, Nature.

[21]  B. Posner,et al.  High-throughput screening-driven lead discovery: meeting the challenges of finding new therapeutics. , 2005, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[22]  Lit-Hsin Loo,et al.  An approach for extensibly profiling the molecular states of cellular subpopulations , 2009, Nature Methods.

[23]  E. Fuchs,et al.  An RNA interference screen uncovers a new molecule in stem cell self-renewal and long-term regeneration , 2012, Nature.

[24]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Small-molecule fluorophores to detect cell-state switching in the context of high-throughput screening. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  P. Andrews,et al.  High-Content Screening for Chemical Modulators of Embryonal Carcinoma Cell Differentiation and Survival , 2011, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[26]  S. Morrison,et al.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Hidenori Akutsu,et al.  A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[28]  R. Passier,et al.  Human stem cells as a model for cardiac differentiation and disease , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[29]  Stanley C. Smith,et al.  Transcriptional Profiling of Neuronal Differentiation by Human Embryonal Carcinoma Stem Cells In Vitro , 2003, Stem cells.

[30]  Bernd Fischer,et al.  CellCognition: time-resolved phenotype annotation in high-throughput live cell imaging , 2010, Nature Methods.

[31]  Stephen T. C. Wong,et al.  Cellular Phenotype Recognition for High-Content RNA Interference Genome-Wide Screening , 2008, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[32]  Lorenz M Mayr,et al.  The Future of High-Throughput Screening , 2008, Journal of biomolecular screening.

[33]  R. Damoiseaux,et al.  Integrated Chemical Genomics Reveals Modifiers of Survival in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[34]  J. Frisén,et al.  High‐Throughput Identification of Genes Promoting Neuron Formation and Lineage Choice in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells , 2007, Stem cells.

[35]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Lab-on-a-chip devices as an emerging platform for stem cell biology. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[36]  G. Dontu,et al.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. , 2003, Genes & development.

[37]  Qikai Xu,et al.  A genome-wide RNAi screen identifies a new transcriptional module required for self-renewal. , 2009, Genes & development.

[38]  Austin G Smith,et al.  Imaging-based chemical screens using normal and glioma-derived neural stem cells. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[39]  Mike Tyers,et al.  Chemical genetics reveals a complex functional ground state of neural stem cells. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension , 2001, Science.

[41]  L. Griffith,et al.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference? , 2010, Cell.

[43]  Herbert Schulz,et al.  A genome-scale RNAi screen for Oct4 modulators defines a role of the Paf1 complex for embryonic stem cell identity. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[44]  Robert Passier,et al.  Genome‐Wide Transcriptional Profiling of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Differentiating to Cardiomyocytes , 2006, Stem cells.

[45]  George Q. Daley,et al.  Disease-Specific Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[46]  H. Schöler,et al.  Self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by a small molecule , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Patterns of basal signaling heterogeneity can distinguish cellular populations with different drug sensitivities , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[48]  J. Cashman,et al.  Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Wnt Pathway Potently Promote Cardiomyocytes From Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Mesoderm , 2011, Circulation research.

[49]  S. Schreiber,et al.  A small molecule that directs differentiation of human ESCs into the pancreatic lineage. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[50]  E. Butcher.  Can cell systems biology rescue drug discovery? , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[51]  N. Perrimon,et al.  High-throughput RNAi screening in cultured cells: a user's guide , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[52]  P. Andrews,et al.  Novel regulators of stem cell fates identified by a multivariate phenotype screen of small compounds on human embryonic stem cell colonies. , 2010, Stem cell research.

[53]  Mohammad Wahid Ansari,et al.  The legal status of in vitro embryos , 2014 .

[54]  Sheng Ding,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[55]  N. Socci,et al.  High-throughput screening assay for the identification of compounds regulating self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[56]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[57]  Wei Min,et al.  RNAi Screening for Fat Regulatory Genes with SRS Microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[58]  H. Erfle,et al.  High-throughput RNAi screening by time-lapse imaging of live human cells , 2006, Nature Methods.

[59]  Lani F. Wu,et al.  Image-based multivariate profiling of drug responses from single cells , 2007, Nature Methods.

[60]  H. Clevers,et al.  Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche , 2009, Nature.

[61]  S T C Wong,et al.  A confident scale–space shape representation framework for cell migration detection , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[62]  Yong-Yeon Cho,et al.  ERK1 and ERK2 regulate embryonic stem cell self-renewal through phosphorylation of Klf4 , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[63]  F. Pampaloni,et al.  The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[64]  W Frank An,et al.  Introduction: cell-based assays for high-throughput screening. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[65]  James A Bankson,et al.  Three-dimensional tissue culture based on magnetic cell levitation. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[66]  Paul A Clemons,et al.  Complex phenotypic assays in high-throughput screening. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[67]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Identification of human brain tumour initiating cells , 2004, Nature.

[68]  Clive N. Svendsen,et al.  Human stem cells and drug screening: opportunities and challenges , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[69]  R. Durbin,et al.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes , 2010, Nature.

[70]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Small molecules efficiently direct endodermal differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[71]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Multilineage Differentiation from Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines , 2001, Stem cells.

[72]  P. Schultz,et al.  A small molecule primes embryonic stem cells for differentiation. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[73]  M. Mercola,et al.  High-throughput screening for modulators of stem cell differentiation. , 2006, Methods in enzymology.

[74]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  High-throughput fluorescence microscopy for systems biology , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[75]  Lorenz M Mayr,et al.  Novel trends in high-throughput screening. , 2009, Current opinion in pharmacology.

[76]  Peter G Schultz,et al.  A synthetic small molecule that induces neuronal differentiation of adult hippocampal neural progenitor cells. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.